Closed nickdos closed 9 years ago
I think we should be sticking with dublin core. So probably the following:
as opposed to copyright ( = license) and attribution ( = rightsHolder)
cc @M-Nicholls @charvolant
Also need to support the "photographer" field... which might be attribution?
the term in the DwC extension is "creator" but we currently use photographer. it can be different to the attribution though - that's determined by the person that owns the rights.
This is done on the master. Just need to deploy to production
This is all done now.
When remotely uploading images via
http://images.ala.org.au/ws/uploadImage
, top-level metadata (attributes of the Image class), as opposed to the Image.metaData (arbitrary data).In particular there are two fields for
Image
that should be set:if those fields are present in the
params.metadata
POSTed data.Currently these values are going through to the "System" metadata but do not appear on the output of http://images.ala.org.au/ws/getImageInfo/{imageId} (unless the param
includeMetadata=true
is added.