[Auto] AI Gallery Standard Validation

[ai-apps-bot]

AI Gallery Standard Validation: PASSED

Repository Management:

• [x] README.md File.
• [x] LICENSE.md File.
• [x] SECURITY.md File.
• [x] CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md File.
• [x] CONTRIBUTING.md File.
• [x] ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md File.
• [x] Topics on repo contains ['azd-templates', 'ai-azd-templates'].

Source code structure and conventions:

• [x] azure-dev.yaml File.
• [x] azure.yaml File.
• [x] ./deploy/aca/infra Folder.
• [x] .devcontainer Folder.

Functional Requirements:

• [x] azd up in ./deploy/aca.
• [x] azd down in ./deploy/aca.
• [x] azd up in ./deploy/aks.
• [x] azd down in ./deploy/aks.
• [x] azd up in ./deploy/app-service.
• [x] azd down in ./deploy/app-service.

How to fix?

The full Definition of Done of the AI-Gallery template and fix approached can be found HERE.

[dantelmomsft]

I've pushed a ⁠commit to solve README alerts and azure-dev.yaml. As I said this an azd multi-platform repo so the validation tool is not going to find infra folder in the root or validate azd up from there ( but it perfectly works if cd in app service, aks, aca folder).

[dantelmomsft]

closing this issue as this should be cleared now with the new commit. if further changes are required to get the repo published in the gallery, we can reopen

[anfibiacreativa]

this an azd multi-platform repo so the validation tool is not going to find infra folder in the root or validate azd up from there ( but it perfectly works if cd in app service, aks, aca folder).

I see. We need to maybe find a pattern to identify this type of structure. Is the deploy folder a convention? If it isn't, we need to work together to find and establish a pattern that would help us define the logical path cc @hund030

[anfibiacreativa]

However, the workflows, are not in place. I was going to be opening a PR for microsoft devops action, but, considering the multiple paths, we may need to think about this together with the above.