search

BFO-ontology / BFO-2020

A repository for BFO 2020 artifacts specified in ISO 21838-2:2020
78 stars 28 forks source link

Why isn't exists-at in the relations table or in OWL #27

Closed alanruttenberg closed 3 years ago

alanruttenberg commented 3 years ago

I had, at some point, a worry about whether it would be a problem in OWL. Articulate a problem or add it as a relation.

Thanks to Hedi Karray for raising this.

dlutz2 commented 3 years ago

'exists at' does seem to be in the OWL but not in the relations table. It doesn't have a domain/range specified in the OWL, presumably entity(?)/temporal region.

alanruttenberg commented 3 years ago

fixed in the next release