Closed jcfr closed 4 years ago
@jcfr Yes, I generally support this. I don't know that I am a great authority on what should or should not be removed. It does seem like anything that might be specific to any particular polygon should be retained in the json. Looking at your example, I wonder about id
, label
, and description
. Since those could be different for each polygon, I guess I would think they should be included.
I am okay with any of these terminology systems: markups
or annotations
or polygons
.
Adding the CCF and cell-locator version info seems like a great idea
I am also thinking we should remove some properties from the annotation file and have there initialized at loading by the application. The idea is to save to LIMS only the relevant information.
@wbwakeman What do you think ? See below for the proposed simplification @allemangD Do you anticipate any issues doing so ?
Other information we should probably include in the JSON under a
metadata
dictionnary:Also which terminologies to you use in LIMS ? I think we should change the
markups
andmarkup
key to properly reflect the used terminology.Originally posted by @jcfr in https://github.com/BICCN/cell-locator/issues/93#issuecomment-683161533