It's very common to check a whole database, so having to use --tables=database1.*,database2.* is cumbersome.
It would help if we could use --databases=database1,database2.
If both --tables and --databases was used, we would just merge the two results.
When using --databases, we could add a check that the slave does not have tables not present on the master (check that makes little sense when providing a pattern of tables, so currently not present).
It's very common to check a whole database, so having to use
--tables=database1.*,database2.*
is cumbersome.It would help if we could use
--databases=database1,database2
.If both
--tables
and--databases
was used, we would just merge the two results.When using
--databases
, we could add a check that the slave does not have tables not present on the master (check that makes little sense when providing a pattern of tables, so currently not present).