Bioconductor / Contributions

Contribute Packages to Bioconductor
134 stars 33 forks source link

iCNV #654

Closed zhouzilu closed 6 years ago

zhouzilu commented 6 years ago

Update the following URL to point to the GitHub repository of the package you wish to submit to Bioconductor

Confirm the following by editing each check box to '[x]'

I am familiar with the essential aspects of Bioconductor software management, including:

For help with submitting your package, please subscribe and post questions to the bioc-devel mailing list.

bioc-issue-bot commented 6 years ago

Hi @zhouzilu

Thanks for submitting your package. We are taking a quick look at it and you will hear back from us soon.

The DESCRIPTION file for this package is:

Package: iCNV
Title: Integrated Copy Number Variation detection
Version: 0.0.4
Author: Zilu Zhou, Nancy Zhang
Maintainer: Zilu Zhou <zhouzilu@pennmedicine.upenn.edu>
Description: Integrative copy number variation (CNV) detection from multiple platform and experimental design.
Depends: R (>= 3.3.1),
  CODEX
License: GPL-2
Encoding: UTF-8
LazyData: true
RoxygenNote: 6.0.1
Imports:
  fields,
  ggplot2,
  truncnorm,
  tidyr,
  data.table,
  dplyr 
Suggests: knitr,
    rmarkdown,
    WES.1KG.WUGSC
VignetteBuilder: knitr
biocViews: ExomeSeq, WholeGenome, SNP, CopyNumberVariation, HiddenMarkovModel
bioc-issue-bot commented 6 years ago

A reviewer has been assigned to your package Learn What to Expect during the review process.

IMPORTANT: Please read the instructions for setting up a push hook on your repository, or further changes to your repository will NOT trigger a new build.

bioc-issue-bot commented 6 years ago

Dear Package contributor,

This is the automated single package builder at bioconductor.org.

Your package has been built on Linux, Mac, and Windows.

On one or more platforms, the build results were: "ERROR". This may mean there is a problem with the package that you need to fix. Or it may mean that there is a problem with the build system itself.

Please see the build report for more details.

bioc-issue-bot commented 6 years ago

Received a valid push; starting a build. Commits are:

91ffabd version update

bioc-issue-bot commented 6 years ago

Dear Package contributor,

This is the automated single package builder at bioconductor.org.

Your package has been built on Linux, Mac, and Windows.

On one or more platforms, the build results were: "ERROR". This may mean there is a problem with the package that you need to fix. Or it may mean that there is a problem with the build system itself.

Please see the build report for more details.

bioc-issue-bot commented 6 years ago

Received a valid push; starting a build. Commits are:

237732f update version number

bioc-issue-bot commented 6 years ago

Dear Package contributor,

This is the automated single package builder at bioconductor.org.

Your package has been built on Linux, Mac, and Windows.

On one or more platforms, the build results were: "ERROR, WARNINGS". This may mean there is a problem with the package that you need to fix. Or it may mean that there is a problem with the build system itself.

Please see the build report for more details.

bioc-issue-bot commented 6 years ago

Received a valid push; starting a build. Commits are:

6dab7ab Update

bioc-issue-bot commented 6 years ago

Dear Package contributor,

This is the automated single package builder at bioconductor.org.

Your package has been built on Linux, Mac, and Windows.

On one or more platforms, the build results were: "WARNINGS". This may mean there is a problem with the package that you need to fix. Or it may mean that there is a problem with the build system itself.

Please see the build report for more details.

bioc-issue-bot commented 6 years ago

Received a valid push; starting a build. Commits are:

3b1e394 Update-warningfix

bioc-issue-bot commented 6 years ago

Dear Package contributor,

This is the automated single package builder at bioconductor.org.

Your package has been built on Linux, Mac, and Windows.

On one or more platforms, the build results were: "WARNINGS". This may mean there is a problem with the package that you need to fix. Or it may mean that there is a problem with the build system itself.

Please see the build report for more details.

bioc-issue-bot commented 6 years ago

Received a valid push; starting a build. Commits are:

c9e48a4 fixwarnings

bioc-issue-bot commented 6 years ago

Dear Package contributor,

This is the automated single package builder at bioconductor.org.

Your package has been built on Linux, Mac, and Windows.

On one or more platforms, the build results were: "WARNINGS". This may mean there is a problem with the package that you need to fix. Or it may mean that there is a problem with the build system itself.

Please see the build report for more details.

zhouzilu commented 6 years ago

@Liubuntu The only warning I receieved is the R version update. In order for this package to be applicable to most of the user, I decided to maintain the requred R version to 3.3.1. Is that possible?

bioc-issue-bot commented 6 years ago

Received a valid push; starting a build. Commits are:

b28de4a version pump

bioc-issue-bot commented 6 years ago

Dear Package contributor,

This is the automated single package builder at bioconductor.org.

Your package has been built on Linux, Mac, and Windows.

On one or more platforms, the build results were: "WARNINGS". This may mean there is a problem with the package that you need to fix. Or it may mean that there is a problem with the build system itself.

Please see the build report for more details.

zhouzilu commented 6 years ago

@Liubuntu Just to make sure it doesn't swamp by the bot. The only warning I receieved is the R version update. In order for this package to be applicable to most of the user, I decided to maintain the requred R version to 3.3.1. Is that possible?

Liubuntu commented 6 years ago

Hi @zhouzilu , Please do the following Update R version dependency from 3.3.1 to 3.5. in DESCRIPTION file. Because the newly accepted packages will go to the Bioc 3.7 devel, which is supposed to work interactively with the R version of 3.5 and up. The Bioc versions are bumped in accordance with the R versions. Thanks!

mtmorgan commented 6 years ago

Just to clarify -- specifying R 3.5 is highly recommended, but not strictly required.

zhouzilu commented 6 years ago

@mtmorgan @Liubuntu Thank you for clarifying this, Martin and Qian. After talked with other author of this package, we have decide to keep our R version as R 3.3.1 due to

Hope this address your concern. In addition, the related paper for this package is going to be finilized in three days. I wonder if we could accelarate the package review process, such that I could include the Bioconductor link in this paper.

Please let me know if you need any other addtional information to proceed.

Liubuntu commented 6 years ago

Hi @zhouzilu ,

Here is the initial review of your package. Please seek to fix all of them and bump the version for a new build. A normal technical review will take about 2 weeks to a month (or longer) depending on the responsiveness and package fixes. The reviewers in the core team has other important responsibilities from Bioconductor. But we could try to accelerate the process working together more efficiently.

DESCRIPTION

Vignette

---
title: ...
output:
  html_document:
      toc: true
---

R

Please fix the following first, and a closer check of R scripts might be given later.

The following are for a more robust R coding practice:

others

Cheers!

zhouzilu commented 6 years ago

@Liubuntu Thank you for your comment. I will edit my package accordingly and bump the version once finished.

bioc-issue-bot commented 6 years ago

Received a valid push; starting a build. Commits are:

1576bfd version bump * version bump to 0.99.14

bioc-issue-bot commented 6 years ago

Dear Package contributor,

This is the automated single package builder at bioconductor.org.

Your package has been built on Linux, Mac, and Windows.

On one or more platforms, the build results were: "skipped, ERROR". This may mean there is a problem with the package that you need to fix. Or it may mean that there is a problem with the build system itself.

Please see the build report for more details.

bioc-issue-bot commented 6 years ago

Received a valid push; starting a build. Commits are:

f37a3c0 Debug - Debug vapply - remove pir, pib - add i...

bioc-issue-bot commented 6 years ago

Dear Package contributor,

This is the automated single package builder at bioconductor.org.

Your package has been built on Linux, Mac, and Windows.

On one or more platforms, the build results were: "skipped, ERROR". This may mean there is a problem with the package that you need to fix. Or it may mean that there is a problem with the build system itself.

Please see the build report for more details.

bioc-issue-bot commented 6 years ago

Received a valid push; starting a build. Commits are:

84fc88e Fix bug Fix bug in the vignette header

bioc-issue-bot commented 6 years ago

Dear Package contributor,

This is the automated single package builder at bioconductor.org.

Your package has been built on Linux, Mac, and Windows.

On one or more platforms, the build results were: "skipped, ERROR". This may mean there is a problem with the package that you need to fix. Or it may mean that there is a problem with the build system itself.

Please see the build report for more details.

bioc-issue-bot commented 6 years ago

Received a valid push; starting a build. Commits are:

ba9d897 fix bug fix bug and bump version

bioc-issue-bot commented 6 years ago

Dear Package contributor,

This is the automated single package builder at bioconductor.org.

Your package has been built on Linux, Mac, and Windows.

On one or more platforms, the build results were: "WARNINGS". This may mean there is a problem with the package that you need to fix. Or it may mean that there is a problem with the build system itself.

Please see the build report for more details.

bioc-issue-bot commented 6 years ago

Received a valid push; starting a build. Commits are:

2c77c82 Note Fix Indentation fix to space sapply fi...

bioc-issue-bot commented 6 years ago

Dear Package contributor,

This is the automated single package builder at bioconductor.org.

Your package has been built on Linux, Mac, and Windows.

On one or more platforms, the build results were: "skipped, ERROR". This may mean there is a problem with the package that you need to fix. Or it may mean that there is a problem with the build system itself.

Please see the build report for more details.

bioc-issue-bot commented 6 years ago

Received a valid push; starting a build. Commits are:

50f2069 Bug fix - add ; - shorter lines

bioc-issue-bot commented 6 years ago

Dear Package contributor,

This is the automated single package builder at bioconductor.org.

Your package has been built on Linux, Mac, and Windows.

On one or more platforms, the build results were: "WARNINGS, ERROR". This may mean there is a problem with the package that you need to fix. Or it may mean that there is a problem with the build system itself.

Please see the build report for more details.

bioc-issue-bot commented 6 years ago

Received a valid push; starting a build. Commits are:

3dbd42b Version bump, Rd update and bug fix

bioc-issue-bot commented 6 years ago

Dear Package contributor,

This is the automated single package builder at bioconductor.org.

Your package has been built on Linux, Mac, and Windows.

On one or more platforms, the build results were: "WARNINGS". This may mean there is a problem with the package that you need to fix. Or it may mean that there is a problem with the build system itself.

Please see the build report for more details.

zhouzilu commented 6 years ago

@Liubuntu Hi Qian, I have finished fixing most of the issue you mentioned except the 4 space indent. This seems a little bit trivial... Is it fine just keep it that way? Other than that, it's all finished. Thank you again!

Liubuntu commented 6 years ago

Hi @zhouzilu ,

Thanks for making those changes to the review. It will surely make your package a better one with more users. I will take another look at your newly modified package and give another review very soon.

First of all, the indentation thing is not strictly required, but we highly recommend for the good R coding styles.

Actually, you can use "tab" key in emacs and it will automatically give you correct indentation. Also for longer lines (> 80 characters), you can use "alt+q" to do the automatic reformatting of the line lengths. OR if you are using Rstudio, the indentation could be done automatically when you goes to the next line ("tab" could also be used).

You can refer to the following sites for coding styles: https://www.bioconductor.org/developers/how-to/coding-style/ http://r-pkgs.had.co.nz/style.html

Like Hadley said in his article, "Good style is important because while your code only has one author, it’ll usually have multiple readers." You really should use a consistent style to make it a better and more readable package for a broader users.

Thanks! Qian

zhouzilu commented 6 years ago

Hi @Liubuntu ,these are really great comments! I will be careful with all the details when I developed my second package. Thank you again!

Liubuntu commented 6 years ago

Hi @zhouzilu ,

Thanks for making your efforts in modifying your package. Here are some additional things to do, but most are just cosmetic. Please bump your version and comment back when you are ready for the final review or with any questions. Thanks!

NAMESPACE

no visible binding problem.

There are still this note in build report for no visible binding for global variable .... These comes from the using of dplyr. Please use .data$ before each use of these variable. E.g., rewrite:

bambaf_from_vcf.R:    dt <- dt %>% dplyr::filter(QUAL!='.') %>% dplyr::select(-REF,-ALT,-QUAL,-FILTER,-INFO)

into:

bambaf_from_vcf.R:    dt <- dt %>% dplyr::filter(.data$QUAL!='.') %>% dplyr::select(-.data$REF,-.data$ALT,-.data$QUAL,-.data$FILTER,-.data$INFO)

And import .data from rlang. Remember to add rlang into your DESCRIPTION in Imports field. This will remove the build check messages:

More information, please check https://community.rstudio.com/t/tidyeval-equivalent-of-mutate/1295/5

build report notes:

bam.baf: no visible binding for global variable QUAL
bam.baf: no visible binding for global variable REF
bam.baf: no visible binding for global variable ALT
bam.baf: no visible binding for global variable FILTER
bam.baf: no visible binding for global variable INFO
bam.baf: no visible binding for global variable FORMAT
bambaf_from_vcf : <anonymous>: no visible binding for global variable
  #CHROM

Search through your source code for all these cases. These are the recommended way for doing it correctly. Try your best, and comment back for any question.

R scripts

get_array_intput <- function(dir=character(),pattern=character(),chr=NULL,projectname=character())

and it will do the automatic check for your input and return error if the input is not in character. You can also use integer() or numeric() for integer or numeric arguments. Search and correct for other similar cases.

Vignette

Cheers! Qian

zhouzilu commented 6 years ago

@Liubuntu Thanks, Qian! I will modify accordingly, bump the version and contact you once finished.

zhouzilu commented 6 years ago

@Liubuntu Quick question about auto check for input type in function. Seems like it doesn't work that way. Do you mind send me your reference? I may have made a mistake somewhere. Also, if I have a default value, for example '.', should I use dir = character('.') Thank you!

Liubuntu commented 6 years ago

Hi @zhouzilu ,

That was from my misunderstanding and sorry for passing that information without checking the validity.

But indeed, it's a better practice to give a default value (of the required data type) for function arguments, and also add some checking for input in the beginning of the function. E.g.,

foo <- function(x=character(), y=numeric())
{
    stopifnot(is.character(x))
    stopifnot(is.numeric(y))
    message("name: ", x, "\n", "Age: ", y, "\n")
}

So that the input value of wrong data type should return an error.

foo("Mei", 23)
## name: Mei
## Age: 23
foo(22, 52)
## Error in foo(22, 52) : is.character(x) is not TRUE
foo("Mei", "a")
## Error in foo("Mei", "a") : is.numeric(y) is not TRUE

And also when users types in args(foo), it will return the arguments with default values, which could serve as a reminder for the correct data type. While it's always useful to specify the required data type in the @param documentation also.

## function (x = character(), y = numeric())
## NULL

This will keep you code robust. You can also add unit tests for these testings and more. We strongly encourage them. See http://bioconductor.org/developers/how-to/unitTesting-guidelines/.

For your other question, default values like "." does not need to specify the data type within the argument. But please include it in the @param documentation.

Best, Qian

Liubuntu commented 6 years ago

Hi @zhouzilu ,

About the "no visible binding problem" in my previous review, there has been discussions within the Bioconductor core team. There are multiple ways of dealing with it, including adding the pronoun as I commented from Hadley's solution, or using "utils::globalVariables" to mute those note messages (which is not recommended, and could be masking of any inappropriate use of that variable), or just prevent using the pipe syntax (Because the pipe syntax is convenient way for end-users, but not appropriate for lower-level programming). There was not a conclusion yet, but soon some guideline about using the pipe syntax in writing an R package will be added.

To simplify, since you are already using this pipe syntax in your own package, and it looks tedious to add the pronoun before each call of the data fields. Although the guideline of reviewing Bioconductor packages is to take care of things that are under control, I would say it is OK to leave those note messages unattended. It should be much simpler to address the rest of issues that are more cosmetic.

Cheers! Qian

Liubuntu commented 6 years ago

Hi @zhouzilu ,

Please make effort in addressing the issues in the last review. Read the comments and adjust accordingly. Since most of the needed things are just cosmetic and could be easy to fix. Bioconductor usually has a 2 weeks rule, and if no reponse (comments / questions / new commits or anything showing your are working to improve your package), the issue will be closed. It was 8 days ago for your last response. So please response within a week so that we can keep this issue open and the package is already very close to acceptance. Thanks!

Best, Qian

zhouzilu commented 6 years ago

Hi @Liubuntu Sorry. I was working on my other project. I will work on it during the weekend and push the update.

Thanks, Zilu

zhouzilu commented 6 years ago

@Liubuntu Qian, really quick question. So I understand I need to add CODEX to the NAMESPACE. However, since CODEX is a Bioconductor package, how should I import it? Is it different from other R packages?

Thank you!

bioc-issue-bot commented 6 years ago

Received a valid push; starting a build. Commits are:

dc84674 Update according to Bioconductor - import rlang -...

bioc-issue-bot commented 6 years ago

Dear Package contributor,

This is the automated single package builder at bioconductor.org.

Your package has been built on Linux, Mac, and Windows.

On one or more platforms, the build results were: "ERROR". This may mean there is a problem with the package that you need to fix. Or it may mean that there is a problem with the build system itself.

Please see the build report for more details.

bioc-issue-bot commented 6 years ago

Received a valid push; starting a build. Commits are:

32f877a add rlang to description