We spotted a record of a common species on a site we are surveying but that dates from before the recorder was involved in the scheme. It has been considered as a test encoding rather than an encoding error. We might easily miss it and we don't know if there are others like this.
From the downloads I am already filtering out all records from sites including the name "test" or with a recorder name from the development team, but I cannot spot any other encoding looking like real.
That would be very kind if you could keep that in mind during further test. Thanks!
We spotted a record of a common species on a site we are surveying but that dates from before the recorder was involved in the scheme. It has been considered as a test encoding rather than an encoding error. We might easily miss it and we don't know if there are others like this. From the downloads I am already filtering out all records from sites including the name "test" or with a recorder name from the development team, but I cannot spot any other encoding looking like real.
That would be very kind if you could keep that in mind during further test. Thanks!