Open samijaber opened 2 years ago
Technical information:
We already have a list of all HTML elements: https://github.com/BuilderIO/mitosis/blob/b8d083ca78bdaec332745d2a0f8c0890335072c4/packages/core/src/constants/html_tags.ts#L1
We want to go to the blockToReact
function, and identify blocks that are native HTML elements, and rename any json.bindings
or json.properties
keys that should be camelCased.
In both of these for-loops, we want to add a check that looks like this:
const isHtmlElement = VALID_HTML_TAGS.includes(json.name);
const checkKeyShouldBeCamelCased = (key: string) => {
// ... TO-DO:
}
const camelCaseNativeHTMLAttribute = (attrName: string) => {
// ... TO-DO:
}
if (isHtmlElement && checkKeyShouldBeCamelCased(key)) {
str += ` ${camelCaseNativeHTMLAttribute(key)=${value}`
} else if // the rest of the code
I will like to take up this issue
oh I'm not sure if lists are the wistest approach here, HTML spec constantly evolves. The intent behind our JSX is that we match React JSX, so srcSet
should be srcSet
in Mitosis too
In the early days I tried to do transformations like this (and we explored it with Qwik for a minute), but it wasn't wise
what's the concern with just writing <picture srcSet>
in mitosis? then we lowercase them
React's logic is similarly intentionally simple, there is no trying to replicate DOM tags and attrs in the library, their logic (which the intent behind Mitosis is)
const isHtmElement = isFirstLetterLowerCase(json.name)
looking a little deeper, I feel a bit more reason to copy react the convention. with all of this we need to account for webcomponents too. what I've observed react's full logic is:
const isHtmlElement = isFirstLetterLowerCase(json.name)
const isBuiltInElement = !json.name.includes('-')
const isCustomElement = json.name.includes('-')
const isBuiltInHtmlAttrName = isHtmlElement && !propertyName.include('-')
const isCustomHtmlAttrName = isHtmlElement && propertyName.includes('-')
but in general we should stick to if Mitosis uses JSX style (camelCase properties) or HTML style. for familiarity, my belief was JSX style is the right way, with one exception for class
- similar to what Solid does.
The intent behind our JSX is that we match React JSX, so
srcSet
should besrcSet
in Mitosis too
I hadn't realized we wanted to match React more closely than the other ones. Thanks for the context
what's the concern with just writing
<picture srcSet>
in mitosis? then we lowercase them
No concern, we could do it one way or the other! My thinking was that since every non-React framework I looked at sticks with the original syntax (Solid supports both srcSet
and srcset
btw), it'd be good to stick with the native casing as React is the odd one out (do a transformation in 1 generator vs in all-but-1)
- oh I'm not sure if lists are the wistest approach here, HTML spec constantly evolves
- there is no trying to replicate DOM tags and attrs in the library
Worth noting that either way, we'll have to manually add every new HTML tag & attribute to our JSX type, so we are constantly maintaining a mirror of the HTML spec regardless. I'd rather stick with the list that's already hardcoded for this issue, and I can go in and replace it with a isFirstLetterLowerCase(json.name)
check in a follow-up PR if we feel strongly about this.
@shubham-y , hold off on working on this temporarily, I'll add a comment later with details about the new approach we want to take to address this.
super interesting that solidjs supports both. I personally like that approach if it's not a logistical headache on the implementation side
my main suggesting is just avoiding hardcoded lists of element tags/properties however possible. all frameworks need to do that for JSX types, but I've never seen it be built into the frameworks itself and affecting logic in these types of ways. I think the main reason why is it's ok if a type is wrong or incomplete (you can override it locally or use any
), but it's not ok if a framework makes a wrong assumption internally
so types can be seen as a nice to have (that you can override/augment), but framework logic you can't override and needs to support more than just what is in the HTML spec today (including custom elements, custom attributes, etc) in a predictable way
@shubham-y Sorry for the delay here! Wanted to chime in with an overall idea for the new approach:
Instead of making the initial HTML casing our default (e.g. srcset
), we want to go with camelCasing (e.g. srcSet
). This approach will work for React by default, but we will need to:
mapCamelCasedHtmlAttribute
function that is reused by all code generators except the React one.The function I'm describing will look roughly like what we've described in this conversation:
/*
* This function does side-effects on `json`
*/
const mapCamelCasedHtmlAttributes = (json: MitosisNode) => {
const isBuiltInHtmlElement = isFirstLetterLowerCase(json.name) && !json.name.includes('-');
if (!isBuiltInHtmlElement) {
return;
}
for (key in json.bindings) {
const isBuiltInHtmlAttrName = !key.include('-')
if (isBuiltInHtmlAttrName) {
const newKey = key.toLowerCase();
// if json[newKey] already exists: show a warning and don't override
json[newKey] = json[key];
delete json[key];
}
}
// repeat the above loop for json.properties too
}
And then you'll want to add this logic to the start of every generator, like here:
A good place would be right after the runPostJsonPlugins
call of each generator.
I think this should work: the snapshot tests will help you (you might have to tweak a snapshot test or add one that shows this transformation). Let me know if you need any additional help! 🙏🏽
Scope
Describe the bug Attributes like
srcset
are camelCased in React (possibly other frameworks? Not sure). However, Mitosis does not account for thatTo Reproduce
A link to a https://mitosis.builder.io/ fiddle containing the bug: link
Expected behavior
scrset
should becomesrcSet
in the React output. Same goes for all HTML attributes that are multi-word: https://reactjs.org/docs/dom-elements.htmlAdditional context