Copy editing / technical /design review after accept: Simulating and visualising data in environmental history: Airborne dust concentration from the Belval plant in Luxembourg (1911-1997)

[inactinique]

PID: ZDFmmD3xv4S7

[eliselavy]

@inactinique Didn't take into account desanomization made by the authors

align with:

[eliselavy]

@inactinique sent for copy-editing

[eliselavy]

@biumiamy copy-editing can be added https://github.com/jdh-observer/ZDFmmD3xv4S7/blob/main/article.md ZDFmmD3xv4S7.docx updated

[biumiamy]

done, PR here: https://github.com/jdh-observer/ZDFmmD3xv4S7/compare/corrections?expand=1

There is one editorial problem in my eyes: They used anchors to refer to sections of their article. But since we dont show those numbers, it's not very easy for readers to understand what they refer to (apart from clicking to jump there.. and then having to scroll back to where they were originally reading).

I recommend the authors to change this to sth that works better with our structure of the frontend. Reference to the name of the chapter or whatever..

Also:

• videos not implemented (I can upload them to vimeo, but they need to decided where to put the videos.. and what text and figure title etc.)
• images (and video make the repo size) too big, need to decrease in last step of design review

[eliselavy]

done, PR here: https://github.com/jdh-observer/ZDFmmD3xv4S7/compare/corrections?expand=1

There is one editorial problem in my eyes: They used anchors to refer to sections of their article. But since we dont show those numbers, it's not very easy for readers to understand what they refer to (apart from clicking to jump there.. and then having to scroll back to where they were originally reading).

I recommend the authors to change this to sth that works better with our structure of the frontend. Reference to the name of the chapter or whatever..

Also:

• videos not implemented (I can upload them to vimeo, but they need to decided where to put the videos.. and what text and figure title etc.)
• images (and video make the repo size) too big, need to decrease in last step of design review

consolidation made - anchor works about the use of the section mention , the reviewer made any feedback about it @inactinique article here

[eliselavy]

@biumiamy social media cover

[biumiamy]

here are the two videos that are in their repo hosted on vimeo: pollution animation pollution Esch And I recommend to integrate the video from their website

(but actually the provided quality is very bad..)

[biumiamy]

@danieleguido the dot beside my mouse pointer is cut off for some reason

[biumiamy]

added social media cover: https://github.com/jdh-observer/ZDFmmD3xv4S7/blob/main/socialmediacover.png

[inactinique]

Hum. Some paragraphs are badly numbered.

[inactinique]

here are the two videos that are in their repo hosted on vimeo: pollution animation pollution Esch And I recommend to integrate the video from their website

(but actually the provided quality is very bad..)

What should I precisely write to them in this respect? There are cells with ffmpeg, but not sure that it is displaying anything?

[inactinique]

Problem of this cell that should be in the hermeneutics layer:

In the markdown fil, it is tagged hermeneutics. Maybe it's something already corrected.

[biumiamy]

What should I precisely write to them in this respect? There are cells with ffmpeg, but not sure that it is displaying anything?

There's only images implemented for the moment. And I dont know, where did you find those cells, I cant see them in Jupyter Lab at least..

You can just ask them

• where they would like to add their 2 videos
• and if they also would like to link the general video from their website (we need a vimeo link then).

[inactinique]

Isn't there that there should be the two videos? (ffmpeg code)