Peer Review

[navysealtf9k]

Hi Cassandra,

You did a good job of introducing yourself. I enjoyed your use of the various features we learned in class, like inserting html links, bolding and the addition of pictures. I really liked your use of qoutation marks and how well it fit in with your description and picture. Furthermore you organized your thoughts on your progress throughout the assignment in a brief and thoughtful manner; something I hope to learn from for the next assignment.

You 'smelled' the gap minder dataset well. You performed a lot of basic exploratory procedures like studying the structure and dimensions of your dataset and then plotting variables of interest to identify any patterns or anomalies. One thing I might add is commenting on some of the code you have used. The reason for this is two fold. It helps the reader understand complex/new syntax they have not seen before and its functionality (like your use of ggplot). it also provides your analysis with context and helps the reader understand the nature of the problem you are seeking to answer.

Overall I think you did a great job and I look forward to being able to review your work again.

Regards

[ksedivyhaley]

Please put peer reviews in the homework submission issue (in this case, #1).

[navysealtf9k]

Hi @ksedivyhaley, I dont understand what you mean. Could you please elaborate what you would like me to do?

Thank you

Regsrfs

[ksedivyhaley]

Sure, @navysealtf9k! It looks like you already copy-pasted your comment, so that's good! Just in case you still need clarification: in the future, when you are making a peer review, please find the homework submission issue (the one titled "hw0X ready for grading") and leave your comment there. It makes it easier to find the peer reviews.

[navysealtf9k]

HI @ksedivyhaley, thanks for clarifying.