Support for KHR_texture_transform should also be added for FeatureIdTexture and PropertyTextureProperty, which also subclass TextureInfo. But I don't believe that generate-classes handles extensions of extensions, so there isn't currently a way to indicate this in glTF.json.
This probably means that FeatureIdTextureView and PropertyTexturePropertyView need to store the extension values, too, and apply them to the input UV coordinates.
Noted from #799.
Support for
KHR_texture_transformshould also be added forFeatureIdTextureandPropertyTextureProperty, which also subclassTextureInfo. But I don't believe thatgenerate-classeshandles extensions of extensions, so there isn't currently a way to indicate this inglTF.json.This probably means that FeatureIdTextureView and PropertyTexturePropertyView need to store the extension values, too, and apply them to the input UV coordinates.