Open ColleagueRiley opened 4 weeks ago
I’m open to alternative build systems for claymore. However, I don’t currently have the skills to implement a makefile myself.
If you or anyone is interested in contributing or has expertise in this area, please feel free to contribute.
How about i go for the nobuild approach.
It's not finished yet just a draft.
TODO:
How about i go for the nobuild approach.
It's not finished yet just a draft.
TODO:
* [x] Build claymore as a library * [x] Cross Platform (currently only linux) * [ ] debug/release
NoBuild sounds like a great alternative, however i think CMake will be more versatile and potentially easier to use
No build is better 😎
I’ve thought about it too since it can make Visual Studio integration easier if people want to contribute with it. But i don't personally use VS or CMake, so integrating them would be a bit tough for me..
So again I'm open to any kind of build system but i would need help integrating them.
The project is very easy to build with any kind of build system thanks to RGFW and all the other header-only libraries.
Got it to build with no-build just fine
I'm struggling to properly setup pybuildc. I think it would be nice if there was a alternative to pybuildc included (such as makefile or make).