issues
search
Code-dot-mil
/
code.mil
An experiment in open source at the Department of Defense.
https://www.code.mil
MIT License
1.28k
stars
123
forks
source link
issues
Newest
Newest
Most commented
Recently updated
Oldest
Least commented
Least recently updated
Contract locks out under-18 contributors?
#58
dylmye
closed
7 years ago
5
Minimally Adapt an Existing License
#57
LawyerMe
closed
7 years ago
3
WTFpl would work well.
#56
sensei-hacker
closed
7 years ago
2
please try to adhere to the GNU ethical repository criteria
#55
markgalassi
closed
7 years ago
5
consider using Mercurial as well as git
#54
markgalassi
closed
7 years ago
5
One of the Federal issues I found in the open source world that may give more reason to the experiment.
#53
missyk5150
closed
7 years ago
5
Why not Public Domain?
#52
impredicative
closed
7 years ago
6
Some suggestions!
#51
xizhao
closed
6 years ago
8
Give section 6 a header and paragraph
#49
o0101
closed
7 years ago
1
What are the legal implications and obligations of 'contract'
#48
Wiladams
closed
7 years ago
5
Room for another?
#47
th3j35t3r
closed
7 years ago
4
Add .editorconfig
#46
tomberek
closed
7 years ago
1
Deletes superfluous whitespace at ends of lines
#45
rthbound
closed
7 years ago
1
NASA hack?
#44
johnmod3
closed
7 years ago
5
Consider renaming upstream organization
#43
andrewgdunn
closed
7 years ago
8
Refactor/cleanup repository
#42
seanenck
closed
7 years ago
3
Please explain Plan/Intent more clearly in Readme
#41
andrewgdunn
closed
7 years ago
5
BSD or D&R License
#40
rthbound
closed
7 years ago
8
Debian Free Software Guidelines Thought Experiments
#39
irl
closed
7 years ago
9
Implement CC0, fixes #37
#38
fulldecent
closed
7 years ago
6
Consider using CC0 for this project
#37
fulldecent
closed
7 years ago
2
Disclaim merchantability and fitness for a purpose
#36
fulldecent
closed
7 years ago
8
seems like doing a DOD variant of bsd-2 or mit license might make it simpler
#35
cartazio
closed
7 years ago
1
Why create your own solution / itemize the problem space?
#34
NoahKunin
closed
7 years ago
25
Poor optics.
#33
eshellman
closed
7 years ago
10
Included DDS and updated call to action
#32
reinastaley
closed
7 years ago
0
Happened across Code.mil
#31
grant51802
closed
7 years ago
4
How does this interact with tech transfer law?
#30
2grep
closed
6 years ago
7
Immediate, Crowdsourced Data from Disaster Areas
#29
edcsalter
closed
7 years ago
2
"Your" not named legal entity; lowercased
#28
buley
closed
7 years ago
2
proposed open source license agreement
#27
Nazgolze
closed
7 years ago
1
add FAQ regarding the origin of Code.mil
#26
spoon16
closed
7 years ago
0
Comparison to NSA Licenses
#25
deveyNull
closed
7 years ago
0
Why not CC0?
#24
Xe
closed
7 years ago
3
grammar/convention things
#23
setgree
closed
7 years ago
3
Section 6 could be header plus paragraph
#22
o0101
closed
7 years ago
2
Probably need to address moral rights
#21
o0101
closed
7 years ago
15
Added link to CONTRIBUTING
#20
IanLee1521
closed
7 years ago
1
I always feel happy contributing to MIT licensed projects.
#19
nanjizal
closed
7 years ago
1
Clarifies future alterations to the agreement and DoD expression of c…
#18
Schwad
closed
7 years ago
7
Update index.html
#17
gaigelama
closed
7 years ago
1
Y in "You" was uppercase
#16
benmcnelly
closed
7 years ago
1
Update LICENSE-agreement.md
#15
tomberek
closed
7 years ago
4
You will need to change the law if I am correct
#14
tinjaw
closed
7 years ago
52
Why do you mix the "licensed" use of the software with contributor agreement policies?
#13
marctjones
closed
7 years ago
13
What is the legal basis for this agreement?
#12
marctjones
closed
7 years ago
10
How will this affect contractors?
#11
aggieben
closed
7 years ago
3
OSI approval?
#10
ckaran
closed
7 years ago
4
Contact the folks at Code.gov
#9
ckaran
closed
7 years ago
2
PLEASE read EVERYTHING ARL has done
#8
ckaran
closed
7 years ago
24
Previous
Next