Team Grade: 5/5 Reasoning: README.md is clear and shows all necessary elements. Videos could use some work, and code seems to run great with amazing technicals from each individual.
Dane: 7.9/8 Graded by Chris Rubin. Reasoning: video needs commentary, but technicals were accomplished and made addAttribute easier to do
Nicholas: 7.75/8 Graded by Dylan Roman. Reasoning: no video, still deserves the points because technicals were on point
Brayden: 7.75/8 Graded by Shekar Krishnamoorthy. Reasoning: video was a little too long, almost 2 minutes, however the technicals looked good on both front end and back end, and video was very informative
Calvin: 7.9/8 Graded by Sam Koenig. Reasoning: everything was great and accomplished but video was too long, exceeds 30s limit
Team Grade: 5/5 Reasoning: README.md is clear and shows all necessary elements. Videos could use some work, and code seems to run great with amazing technicals from each individual.
Dane: 7.9/8 Graded by Chris Rubin. Reasoning: video needs commentary, but technicals were accomplished and made addAttribute easier to do Nicholas: 7.75/8 Graded by Dylan Roman. Reasoning: no video, still deserves the points because technicals were on point Brayden: 7.75/8 Graded by Shekar Krishnamoorthy. Reasoning: video was a little too long, almost 2 minutes, however the technicals looked good on both front end and back end, and video was very informative Calvin: 7.9/8 Graded by Sam Koenig. Reasoning: everything was great and accomplished but video was too long, exceeds 30s limit
Best Things:
Areas to work on: