search

D1935827V / spring_portfolio

Tri 1: Java and Spring Intro
0 stars 0 forks source link

Week 7 Peer Review Grade #45

Open calvinc903 opened 2 years ago

Chris-Ru commented 2 years ago

Team Grade: 5/5 Reasoning: README.md is clear and shows all necessary elements. Videos could use some work, and code seems to run great with amazing technicals from each individual.

Dane: 7.9/8 Graded by Chris Rubin. Reasoning: video needs commentary, but technicals were accomplished and made addAttribute easier to do Nicholas: 7.75/8 Graded by Dylan Roman. Reasoning: no video, still deserves the points because technicals were on point Brayden: 7.75/8 Graded by Shekar Krishnamoorthy. Reasoning: video was a little too long, almost 2 minutes, however the technicals looked good on both front end and back end, and video was very informative Calvin: 7.9/8 Graded by Sam Koenig. Reasoning: everything was great and accomplished but video was too long, exceeds 30s limit

Best Things:

  1. Organization on readme, tickets(https://github.com/D1935827V/spring_portfolio/projects/1#column-15620905), and notes
  2. Videos for the most part touched on all aspects necessary with what they did individually
  3. technicals were solid and great. efficiency is key and that was accomplished. [example](

)

Areas to work on:

  1. Video is not all together
  2. coordination, some things are in different places
  3. make sure tickets are in correct place, 1 or 2 tickets were not in the review column