Some users are not flagged properly as humanities

[tymees]

We've had two topdesk tickets (M240215147 and M240204594) indicating the portal does not think they work at GW.

Not entirely sure why, in both cases their Solis ID is properly flagged as hum-affiliated. Maybe the IdP just didn't send that info?

In both cases the user in question did not have any faculty assigned, so maybe we should change the text of that specific case to be less definite?

[tymees]

So the 'we don't know any faculty' text is definitly too harsh, and should be more honest about the situation.

Proposal new texts:

Faculty known: (unchanged)

Deze portal is bedoeld voor medewerkers (en studenten) van de Faculteit Geesteswetenschappen. Volgens onze gegevens werk/studeer je bij de {X}. Controleer of je inderdaad een aanvraag wilt indienen bij de Facultaire Ethische Toetsingscommissie van Geesteswetenschappen. Als je vermoedt dat dit incorrect is, neem dan contact op met portal support.

Faculty unknown:

Wij konden niet verifieren bij welke faculteit je in dienst bent. Deze portal is bedoeld voor medewerkers (en studenten) van de Faculteit Geesteswetenschappen. Controleer of je inderdaad een aanvraag wilt indienen bij de Facultaire Ethische Toetsingscommissie van Geesteswetenschappen. Indien dat het geval is kan de portal gewoon gebruiken. Voor vragen kan je contact opnemen met portal support.

@djhcapel Is this okay?

[djhcapel]

I did not understand what 'dit' referred to in the Faculty known text? Suggestion (if my understanding is correct, but why would they need to contact you?):

Deze portal is bedoeld voor medewerkers (en studenten) van de Faculteit Geesteswetenschappen. Volgens onze gegevens werk/studeer je bij de {X}. Controleer of je inderdaad een aanvraag wilt indienen bij de Facultaire Ethische Toetsingscommissie van Geesteswetenschappen. Als je niet verbonden bent aan {X}, neem dan contact op met portal support.

[tymees]

'Dit' indeed refers to 'we think you belong to x'. So your new wording would be clearer.

As to why they would need to contact us; well, it's mainly just to provide a 'complaints' contact. But, it might happen that someone is employed by multiple faculties, and we simply do not know atm what that would do. (No real-life testcase for it).

But my main concern is the 'faculty unknown' text. Is that text okay?

[djhcapel]

faculty unknown' text

• verifieren > verifiëren
• Indien dat het geval is kan de portal gewoon gebruiken. > Indien dat het geval is kan je de portal gewoon gebruiken. (not bold of course, just to indicate what is different)
• kan je > kun je (personal preference ;-) )
• portal support (dc: with link to email address I think?)

[tymees]

Some actual info on the issue:

https://centre-for-digital-humanities.sentry.io/issues/5249417328/?query=is%3Aunresolved&referrer=issue-stream&stream_index=3

At first read, it would imply that the user object does not yet exist. Which might make sense for new users, which admitedly isn't something I thoroughly tested.

However, I'm not confinced that this is actually the case, for multiple reasons:

• This should rectify itself on subsequent logins. It does not appear to do that.
• This issue also happened with a member of one of the chambers, that user definitly existed already
• The actual error is odd. Normally you'd get a different error when trying to add a related object to an unsaved object.