issues
search
DILCISBoard
/
E-ARK-AIP
E-ARK AIP Specification
https://earkaip.dilcis.eu/
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
8
stars
4
forks
source link
issues
Newest
Newest
Most commented
Recently updated
Oldest
Least commented
Least recently updated
Documents for the different IPs should be standardized
#40
shsdev
closed
5 years ago
2
All extra elements for SIP, AIP and DIP should be included in CSIP
#39
shsdev
closed
5 years ago
2
Proposal of adding Keywords (subjects) to make an IP searchable: Proposed element Keywords
#38
shsdev
closed
1 year ago
2
Proposal of adding Information security classification: Proposed element Classification
#37
shsdev
closed
1 year ago
2
Proposal of adding Retention/Disposal elements: Proposed element Preservation reference
#36
shsdev
closed
1 year ago
2
Proposal of adding Retention/Disposal elements: Proposed element Preservation date
#35
shsdev
opened
5 years ago
3
Proposal of adding Retention/Disposal elements: Proposed element Preservation status
#34
shsdev
closed
1 year ago
2
Incorrect footnote
#33
shsdev
closed
5 years ago
1
Revise usage of path replacement characters
#32
shsdev
closed
5 years ago
1
Consistent use of symbols in identifiers
#31
shsdev
closed
5 years ago
1
Other characterisation outpout possible?
#30
shsdev
closed
5 years ago
1
Extra characters
#29
shsdev
closed
5 years ago
1
Incorrect file name in figure 11
#28
shsdev
closed
5 years ago
1
Incorrect file name used in figure 11
#27
shsdev
closed
5 years ago
1
Does updating original submission lead to forks?
#26
shsdev
closed
5 years ago
1
Simplification of the overall structure
#25
shsdev
closed
5 years ago
1
figures 10 and 11 too complex
#24
shsdev
closed
5 years ago
1
Directory structure is too complex
#23
shsdev
closed
5 years ago
1
Updating AIP if overwriting is practically impossible
#22
shsdev
closed
5 years ago
1
AIP export functionality does not reduce costs
#21
shsdev
closed
5 years ago
1
Figure 5 - two folders named "binary"
#20
PhillipTommerholt
closed
5 years ago
1
Important attributes such as authorship of the document are missing
#19
shsdev
closed
5 years ago
1
Minor changes to summary
#18
shsdev
closed
5 years ago
0
Missing scope of AIP specification
#17
shsdev
closed
5 years ago
1
Update executive summary
#16
shsdev
closed
5 years ago
0
Summary too much focused on E-ARK project
#15
shsdev
closed
5 years ago
1
FEAT - First cut Markdown specification
#14
carlwilson
closed
5 years ago
0
We are missing AIP examples in the repository
#13
jmaferreira
closed
6 years ago
0
Sentence is difficult to understand
#12
jmaferreira
closed
6 years ago
1
Explain why we need a Package manifest
#11
jmaferreira
closed
6 years ago
1
Better examples are needed on the file IDs
#10
jmaferreira
closed
6 years ago
2
Pointless recommendation or wrong example
#9
jmaferreira
closed
6 years ago
1
IPs or SIPs?
#8
jmaferreira
closed
6 years ago
1
There might be a wrong enforcement in the Requirement 14 (page 16)
#7
jmaferreira
closed
6 years ago
1
Reference to the wrong section
#6
jmaferreira
closed
6 years ago
1
Remove references to E-ARK or add a section explaining what E-ARK was
#5
jmaferreira
closed
6 years ago
2
Enhance the introduction with an explanation of the purpose of the document and the AIP
#4
jmaferreira
closed
6 years ago
2
The Executive Summary needs a major do-over
#3
jmaferreira
closed
5 years ago
5
Important diplomatic attributes are missing on the specification document (e.g. authors)
#2
jmaferreira
closed
6 years ago
4
Please update the README.md to include more information about the purpose of this repository
#1
jmaferreira
closed
7 years ago
1
Previous