Closed 130s closed 3 years ago
I don't have publicly-shareable example yet (if desired I might be able to provide shareable sample) but I'm seeing:
Removing exec_depend nora_rs Removing exec_depend nora_utils Removing exec_depend rt Removing exec_depend rppb +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+| update_metapackage (nora_sdk) |+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ --- package.xml +++ package.xml (modified) @@ -9,10 +9,6 @@ <buildtool_depend>catkin</buildtool_depend> - <exec_depend>nora_rs</exec_depend> - <exec_depend>nora_utils</exec_depend> - <exec_depend>rt</exec_depend> - <exec_depend>rppb</exec_depend> <export> <metapackage/> </export> Would you like to make this change? [y/N]
Isn't exec_depend valid thing to do for a meta pkg? REP-140
exec_depend
Whoops. Thanks for reporting this.
This is actually only a bug with the interactive version of that rule, but it still needs to be fixed.
Problem
I don't have publicly-shareable example yet (if desired I might be able to provide shareable sample) but I'm seeing:
Isn't
exec_depend
valid thing to do for a meta pkg? REP-140