Danko-Lab TED issues - Githubissues

Danko-Lab / TED

a fully Bayesian approach to deconvolve tumor microenvironment

60 stars 10 forks source link

issues

Newest

Newest Most commented Recently updated Oldest Least commented Least recently updated

Issue running run.Ted()

#30 hannahsfuchs opened 10 months ago
0
Suggestions on building own single cell reference

#29 Tianqi-Ma closed 1 year ago
3
Generally high tumor proportion from TCGA data

#28 SBaek613 opened 2 years ago
1
error: undefined columns selected

#27 Chao-Guo-hub closed 2 years ago
0
scRNA reference matrix issues

#26 SBaek613 closed 2 years ago
1
A question about the dangerous cell types

#25 XUEbaogai0101 closed 2 years ago
9
Could I use this method to infer cell type from samples which are not tumor samples, likes untreated and treated samples?

#24 Jihong528 opened 2 years ago
3
Issues with snowfall - parallel execution

#23 albertop210 closed 2 years ago
2
checkForRemoteErrors(val) : one node produced an error: could not find function "rmultinom"

#22 kanefos closed 2 years ago
10
The results of dREG Portal

#21 yunbokai opened 2 years ago
1
Running Error using "run.Ted"

#20 longmin0706 opened 2 years ago
2
Clarification in input samples

#19 DustinSokolowski opened 2 years ago
3
1 current sample ID:1 Error in FUN(X[[i]], ...) : argument "seed" is missing, with no default

#18 vincent1715 opened 2 years ago
2
Seed argument for publication reproduciblity

#17 t-carroll closed 2 years ago
2
Error running TED: Error: $ operator is invalid for atomic vectors

#16 zroger49 opened 2 years ago
6
vst transformation is feasible, but failed executing the next command

#15 emkahuda opened 2 years ago
17
could not find function, 'norm.to.one'

#14 Ci-TJ closed 2 years ago
1
Error in rmultinom

#13 xzhouaw opened 2 years ago
5
Fix for get.cormat when VST is not feasible

#12 t-carroll closed 3 years ago
2
Clarification of tumor subtype strategy

#11 t-carroll closed 3 years ago
2
run TED on non-tumor data

#10 RK1912 closed 3 years ago
8
does normalized data input work well?

#9 yingyonghui opened 3 years ago
1
Allow separate parallelization parameters for "correct batch effect" and other phases

#8 t-carroll closed 3 years ago
5
Allow tum.key=NULL for scRNA in runTed.R

#7 t-carroll closed 4 years ago
0
Error during correct batch effect

#6 t-carroll closed 4 years ago
6
small suggestions

#5 kvittingseerup opened 4 years ago
5
Also output tumor expression profile

#4 kvittingseerup closed 4 years ago
2
Relaxation of assumption of identical stroma expression profiles

#3 kvittingseerup closed 4 years ago
5
Uncertainty of estimated proportions

#2 kvittingseerup closed 4 years ago
3
Help with expected input

#1 kvittingseerup closed 4 years ago
6