Dynamic Weight Calculation AND Enhanced User Interface

[Kritika75]

Allow users to set the weights dynamically based on their total preferences. For example, if a user sets one weight to 100%, automatically adjust the others to total 100% based on user inputs and reset Button: Add a button to reset all sliders to their default values.

Implementing these suggestions could enhance the interactivity, usability, and effectiveness of your mining site recommendation file.

Could assign me this under GSSoC'24 extd?

Thank you @Devanik21

[github-actions[bot]]

👋 Thank you for raising an issue! We appreciate your effort in helping us improve. Our team will review it shortly. Stay tuned!

[Devanik21]

Allow users to set the weights dynamically based on their total preferences. For example, if a user sets one weight to 100%, automatically adjust the others to total 100% based on user inputs and reset Button: Add a button to reset all sliders to their default values.

Implementing these suggestions could enhance the interactivity, usability, and effectiveness of your mining site recommendation file.

Could assign me this under GSSoC'24 extd?

Thank you @Devanik21

hello @Kritika75 , can you explain me more , it will be helpful

[Kritika75]

Dynamic weight calculation lets users adjust the importance of different factors (like iron content, water content, etc.) when recommending mining sites. To keep things balanced, we make sure the total weight of all these factors equals 1.0. Without this, users might set high importance on certain features (e.g., iron or water) and forget others (like distance or sustainability), leading to unbalanced predictions. Normalizing the weights improves accuracy and keeps everything in check.

For the enhanced user interface, the reset button helps users quickly reset all sliders to their default values. This makes the app more user-friendly, allowing users to start fresh without manually resetting each slider. It adds convenience and improves overall user satisfaction.

@Devanik21

[Devanik21]

@Kritika75 But there may be unusually high or low iron content in some planetary locations. This is why it’s important to not just focus on weight normalization

[Devanik21]

else it will interfere the user

[Kritika75]

That makes sense!! to solve this, I propose a flexible approach that allows the model to adapt dynamically to both user preferences and real-world variability. By introducing a mechanism that prioritizes specific features when their values are exceptionally high or low (e.g., giving more weight to iron content when it's unusually abundant), the system will become more intuitive and responsive to unique scenarios. This approach strikes a balance—ensuring normalized weights for overall consistency while still empowering users to prioritize key factors when necessary, without being restricted by the system @Devanik21

[Devanik21]

@Kritika75 , sure raise a pr

[AKSHITHA-CHILUKA]

add level label

[PadmasreeSangani]

Hi, I would like to work on this issue. Can I be assigned, please?

[Absk024]

i would like to contribute @Devanik21