@SachaG I tried to create a simpler to understand plot for the features. This is the original default.
And other views can be selected to show either
or
Some things that can be improved on the second and third views:
Some circles do not have a name. Even when hovered over, the feature that corresponds to these does not appear.
It takes us three different views which can be captured into one.
Here is a draft of the simple suggestion:
Advantages (Insights):
In one view, we can see the data for all of
a) heard (awareness) - light green
b) used (usage) - dark green
c) not heard - light red
The colors mentioned are chosen to associate mood to the response. Something like 'not heard' is negative, 'used' is positive, and 'heard' is positive but not to the level of 'used'. (@michaelquiapos - Let me know your color choices for improvement.)
The more oriented towards the right a chart is, the better since this means that features are being used.
Mostly/Least used features overall can still be viewed because the x-axis is shared among all facets.
Disadvantage is I am not sure if this is easy to implement when using nivo. Also, these are just counts of responses. We know that each of these are optional so what isn't here is the total number of respondents for each item.
@SachaG I tried to create a simpler to understand plot for the features. This is the original default.
And other views can be selected to show either
or
Some things that can be improved on the second and third views:
Here is a draft of the simple suggestion:
Advantages (Insights):
Disadvantage is I am not sure if this is easy to implement when using nivo. Also, these are just counts of responses. We know that each of these are optional so what isn't here is the total number of respondents for each item.