Closed matt-wallis closed 2 years ago
I think we should be considering the domains owned by coops as assets. We could either add this to our version of ESSGlobal or use the Organization vocab in its hierarchy.
We should drop an email to Joe
Searching the web finds this, which I've not yet read in detail:
More:
Which links to:
The DNS ontology schema was published here, but that domain no longer exists, and isn't cached on the Wayback archive:
http://www.dhpc.adelaide.edu.au/ontologies/dns.html
However, I found a search engine for ontologies:
http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/
Which finds the uri4uri and another, proton. Possibly we could use one of these terms:
http://uri4uri.net/domain (nice insider joke on the 404s on this site)
Or:
http://www.ontotext.com/proton/protonext.html#InternetDomain
Alternatively we could email the authors 1 and 2 for the schema information.
However, since "Internet Domain" seems to exist in several ontologies on LOV (see above) I also wonder if the right thing is to invent our own vocab and allow other people to map that to their own as necessary.
Sometimes, we may want to explicitly include domain name in a dataset, as distinct from website/homepage. This may be true for the dotcoop dataset.
Which ontology/vocab/predicate should we use?