Closed slevis-lmwg closed 1 year ago
With #50 I showed that it's safe to remove use_cn and BGC code.
The last commit (https://github.com/ESCOMP/SimpleLand/pull/46/commits/aa77f2a9eb26da77b78462a2d41e9afb857c843a) reverted to a commit that had removed use_cn and canceled a subsequent commit that had removed co2_ppmv and co2_type because in the latter I started seeing diffs from baseline.
For the record:
I have now tested this commit https://github.com/ESCOMP/SimpleLand/pull/46/commits/be98eb692d84ded65174cd28881ed99f248fe436 also on cheyenne and it's OK, plus a test that was failing now passes:
SMS_Lm3.f19_g16.H_MML_2000_CAM5.cheyenne_gnu.clm-global_uniform_g16_SOM
I tried git ls-files | xargs wc -l
on the latest commit
and got current number of lines: 67887
Goal is about 46000
Also I ran both test-suites on the latest commit and izumi OK cheyenne OK
@ekluzek Starting with https://github.com/ESCOMP/SimpleLand/pull/46/commits/2c30b33363aacd0542a3e87081ba9863f0e6354c and over the course of a few commits, I removed the drydep code from my branch. I saw your conversation with Isla and hope that I don't need to bring drydep back...
I'm still pretty confident we don't need to bring drydep back. And if we do -- it won't be in it's current form -- it would be a prescribed mode. So it would just read data off the mml_surdat file and send it. But, I think this all will be done in the cesm2_3 branch and not in the cesm2_1 branch. So I don't see that you'll bring drydep back at all.
I agree with Erik - if we need it (looking into that is on my list for tomorrow!) we'd just grab the climatological flux from a coupled run, put it in the input file, and have SLIM pass it up to the atmosphere like we do now with dust.
Most recent git ls-files | xargs wc -l
gives 53288.
New baselines: slim-n11_cesm2.1.4
New tag: slim0.1.007_release-cesm2.1.4
Resolves #44 (I will continue updating my notes there for now) Resolves #50
Collaborators: @ekluzek