Closed sobolevnrm closed 2 years ago
It looks like 1EJG does have a gap in the backbone:
REMARK 470
REMARK 470 MISSING ATOM
REMARK 470 THE FOLLOWING RESIDUES HAVE MISSING ATOMS (M=MODEL NUMBER;
REMARK 470 RES=RESIDUE NAME; C=CHAIN IDENTIFIER; SSEQ=SEQUENCE NUMBER;
REMARK 470 I=INSERTION CODE):
REMARK 470 M RES CSSEQI ATOMS
REMARK 470 PRO A 22 N
Ideally, PDB2PQR would be able to fix a 1-atom gap but it cannot right now so I think this is a legitimate structure to skip in tests.
4MGP also has a gap in the backbone:
REMARK 470
REMARK 470 MISSING ATOM
REMARK 470 THE FOLLOWING RESIDUES HAVE MISSING ATOMS (M=MODEL NUMBER;
REMARK 470 RES=RESIDUE NAME; C=CHAIN IDENTIFIER; SSEQ=SEQUENCE NUMBER;
REMARK 470 I=INSERTION CODE):
REMARK 470 M RES CSSEQI ATOMS
REMARK 470 LYS A 11 CE NZ
REMARK 470 LYS A 14 CG CD CE NZ
REMARK 470 SER A 23 CA C O CB OG
The gap at SER 23 is definitely beyond PDB2PQR's current capabilities to fix.
2V75 also has a gap in the backbone:
REMARK 470
REMARK 470 MISSING ATOM
REMARK 470 THE FOLLOWING RESIDUES HAVE MISSING ATOMS (M=MODEL NUMBER;
REMARK 470 RES=RESIDUE NAME; C=CHAIN IDENTIFIER; SSEQ=SEQUENCE NUMBER;
REMARK 470 I=INSERTION CODE):
REMARK 470 M RES CSSEQI ATOMS
REMARK 470 ASN A 95 CA C O CB CG OD1 ND2
The gap at ASN 95 is also too big for PDB2PQR to currently fix.
In testing the long list of molecules mentioned in #36, three entries failed:
These structures should be tested more thoroughly to understand why PDB2PQR is failing.