Closed sunimei3 closed 2 years ago
Hello. I just tried a calculation and it worked without issue. Can you please try again and/or post more information about the specific calculation that failed for you?
I see, it seems to be input-dependent. It hangs there if I use a certain input. I will look at the file I submited
https://server.poissonboltzmann.org/jobstatus?jobtype=pdb2pqr&jobid=edfrkmxem7&date=2022-05-27 Could you please inform us what does this error mean?
2022-05-27 16:10:09,844 WARNING:main.py:664:non_trivial:Using ZAP9 forcefield for ligand radii. 2022-05-27 16:10:09,846 WARNING:main.py:692:non_trivial:Residue ILD A 201 has non-integer charge: 103.5 deviates by 0.5 from integral, exceeding error tolerance 0.001 2022-05-27 16:10:09,846 CRITICAL:main.py:793:main_driver:103.5 deviates by 0.5 from integral, exceeding error tolerance 0.001 2022-05-27 16:10:09,846 CRITICAL:main.py:794:main_driver:Giving up.
There is a problem with the charge assignment routine on your input file. Does it have unusual atoms in it?
Is there any specific way to tweak the input to enable the job to run faster (with shorter pending time)?
Hello!
Is this last question (about enabling the job to run faster) about the same inputs/problems used in the original question that opened this issue? Just checking if we should open a new ticket.
Thanks, Jay
Thank you so much for the email! The problem was solved. Thanks, Georgiana
发件人: Jaydeep Bardhan @.> 发送时间: 2022年6月24日 16:24 收件人: Electrostatics/pdb2pqr @.> 抄送: GeorgianaLiang @.>; Comment @.> 主题: Re: [Electrostatics/pdb2pqr] server stuck (Issue #318)
Hello!
Is this last question (about enabling the job to run faster) about the same inputs/problems used in the original question that opened this issue? Just checking if we should open a new ticket.
Thanks, Jay
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/Electrostatics/pdb2pqr/issues/318#issuecomment-1165951613, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AWOJ5RDIEFLVWZI6YPUGHRDVQYRQVANCNFSM5XBHN6PQ. You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.**@.>>
Hi Is PDB2PQR server stuck or just the queue is very long suddenly?