Closed PRemmen closed 9 years ago
I suggest we begin to do the new refinements on the program structure after we get the 1st use case running on Python side. Because I wanna get a clear idea how the system API is working on Python side for manipulating the Modelica data model generation. Afterwards, we will know how much additional effort and new development requirements we need to do, in order to implement the whole framework.
Okay, in any case, we should split up in different branches in order to have a better overview of our developement
Sure, definitely u r right! We can split the work earlier .
From: Peter Remmen [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Monday, September 07, 2015 11:45 AM To: EnEff-BIM/EnEffBIM-Framework Cc: Cao, Jun Subject: Re: [EnEffBIM-Framework] Issue50 api enhancement (#61)
Okay, in any case, we should split up in different branches in order to have a better overview of our developement
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/EnEff-BIM/EnEffBIM-Framework/pull/61#issuecomment-138253816.
Since we are developing the API in the branch "LibSimmodel_API" this merge request is outdated. see also #50
I think it might be a good idea to merge this into the master and then divide the work into small issues and work on that in different branches. What do you think @thorade @math-boy