|GithubActions| |CircleCI| |Appveyor| |Codecov| |Pypi| |PypiDownloads| |ReadTheDocs|
.. The large version wont work because github strips rst image rescaling. .. image:: https://i.imgur.com/u0tYYxM.png :height: 100px :align: left
Xdoctest - Execute doctests. A Python package for executing tests in documentation strings!
What is a doctest <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctest>
?
It is example code you write in a docstring!
What is a docstring <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Docstring>
?
Its a string you use as a comment! They get attached to Python functions and
classes as metadata. They are often used to auto-generate documentation.
Why is it cool?
Because you can write tests while you code!
Tests are good. Documentation is good. Examples are good. Doctests have low boilerplate, you write them in the same file you write your code. It often can help you write the function. Write down how to construct minimal demo inputs (it helps to have tools to create these) in your file. Copy that code into IPython/Jupyter, and play with your implementation. Copy your finished code into the body. Write down how to call the function with the demo inputs. If you feel inclined, check that the result matches an expected result (while asserts and checks are nice, a test that just shows how to run the code is better than no test at all).
.. code:: python
def an_algorithm(data, config):
"""
Example:
>>> data = '([()[]])[{}([[]])]'
>>> config = {'outer': sum, 'inner': ord}
>>> an_algorithm(data, config)
1411
"""
# I wrote this function by first finding some interesting demodata
# then I wrote the body in IPython and copied it back in.
# Now I can re-use this test code I wrote in development as a test!
# Covered Code is much easier to debug (we have a MWE)!
result = config['outer'](map(config['inner'], data))
return result
The problem? How do you run the code in your doctest?
Xdoctest finds and executes your doctests for you.
Just run xdoctest <path-to-my-module>
.
It plugs into pytest to make it easy to run on a CI. Install and run
pytest --xdoctest
.
The xdoctest
package is a re-write of Python's builtin doctest
module. It replaces the old regex-based parser with a new
abstract-syntax-tree based parser (using Python's ast
module). The
goal is to make doctests easier to write, simpler to configure, and
encourage the pattern of test driven development.
+------------------+----------------------------------------------+
| Read the docs | https://xdoctest.readthedocs.io |
+------------------+----------------------------------------------+
| Github | https://github.com/Erotemic/xdoctest |
+------------------+----------------------------------------------+
| Pypi | https://pypi.org/project/xdoctest |
+------------------+----------------------------------------------+
| PyCon 2020 | Youtube Video
and Google Slides
|
+------------------+----------------------------------------------+
.. _Youtube Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUjCqOw_oFk .. _Google Slides: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1563XL-n7534QmktrkLSjVqX36z5uhjUFrPw8wIO6z1c
Installation: from pypi ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Xdoctest is distributed on pypi as a universal wheel and can be pip installed on Python 3.8+ (Python 2.7 and 3.4 / 3.5 support was removed in Version 1.1.0, 3.6 / 3.7 support was removed in Version 1.2.0). Installations are tested on CPython and PyPy implementations.
::
pip install xdoctest
Distributions on pypi are signed with a GPG public key: D297D757
. If you
care enough to check the gpg signature (hopefully pip will just do this in the
future), you should also verify this agrees with the contents of
dev/public_gpg_key
.
Usage: run your doctests ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
After installing, the fastest way to run all doctests in your project is:
::
python -m xdoctest /path/to/your/pkg-or-module.py
or if your module has been pip-installed / is in the PYTHONPATH run
::
python -m xdoctest yourmodname
There are two ways to use xdoctest
: via pytest
or via the native
interface. The native interface is less opaque and implicit, but its
purpose is to run doctests. The other option is to use the widely used
pytest
package. This allows you to run both unit tests and doctests
with the same command and has many other advantages.
It is recommended to use pytest
for automatic testing (e.g. in your
CI scripts), but for debugging it may be easier to use the native
interface.
Check if xdoctest will work on your package ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You can quickly check if xdoctest
will work on your package
out-of-the box by installing it via pip and running
python -m xdoctest <pkg> all
, where <pkg>
is the path to your
python package / module (or its name if it is installed in your
PYTHONPATH
).
For example with you might test if xdoctest
works on networkx
or
sklearn
as such: python -m xdoctest networkx all
/
python -m xdoctest sklearn all
.
Using the pytest interface ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
When pytest
is run, xdoctest
is automatically discovered, but is
disabled by default. This is because xdoctest
needs to replace the builtin
doctest
plugin.
To enable this plugin, run pytest
with --xdoctest
or --xdoc
.
This can either be specified on the command line or added to your
addopts
options in the [pytest]
section of your pytest.ini
or tox.ini
.
To run a specific doctest, xdoctest
sets up pytest
node names
for these doctests using the following pattern:
<path/to/file.py>::<callname>:<num>
. For example a doctest for a
function might look like this mymod.py::funcname:0
, and a class
method might look like this: mymod.py::ClassName::method:0
Using the native interface. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
In addition to the pytest
plugin, xdoctest has a native doctest runner.
You can use the xdoctest
command line tool that is installed with the
package and point it a module directory or a particular file.
You can also make it such that invoking your module as __main__
invokes the
xdoctest native runner using the using the xdoctest.doctest_module(path)
method, which can be placed in the __main__
section of any module as such:
.. code:: python
if __name__ == '__main__':
import xdoctest
xdoctest.doctest_module(__file__)
This sets up the ability to invoke the xdoctest
command line
interface. python -m <modname> <command>
.
However, it is typically prefered to just use the xdoctest
executable and
pass it the path to your file, or the name of an installed module. In this case
it is invoked like xdoctest -m <modname> <command>
.
Using either of these methods you can natively invoke xdoctest on a module or package, which exposes the command line interface. Both of these expose the command line interface, allowing you to pass a command to xdoctest.
If <command>
is all
, then each enabled doctest in the module
is executed: python -m <modname> all
If <command>
is list
, then the names of each enabled doctest
is listed.
If <command>
is dump
, then all doctests are converted into a format
suitable for unit testing, and dumped to stdout (new in 0.4.0).
If <command>
is a callname
(name of a function or a class and
method), then that specific doctest is executed:
python -m <modname> <callname>
. Note: you can execute disabled
doctests or functions without any arguments (zero-args) this way.
For example if you created a module mymod.py
with the following
code:
.. code:: python
def func1():
"""
Example:
>>> assert func1() == 1
"""
return 1
def func2(a):
"""
Example:
>>> assert func2(1) == 2
>>> assert func2(2) == 3
"""
return a + 1
You could
xdoctest -m mymod list
to list the names of all functions with doctestsxdoctest -m mymod all
to run all functions with doctestsxdoctest -m mymod func1
to run only func1's doctestxdoctest -m mymod func2
to run only func2's doctestPassing --help
to either way of invoking the native runner will result in
something similar to the following that outlines what other options are
available:
.. code::
usage: xdoctest [-h] [--version] [-m MODNAME] [-c COMMAND] [--style {auto,google,freeform}] [--analysis {auto,static,dynamic}] [--durations DURATIONS] [--time]
[--colored COLORED] [--nocolor] [--offset] [--report {none,cdiff,ndiff,udiff,only_first_failure}] [--options OPTIONS] [--global-exec GLOBAL_EXEC]
[--verbose VERBOSE] [--quiet] [--silent]
[arg ...]
Xdoctest 1.0.1 - on Python - 3.9.9 (main, Jun 10 2022, 17:45:11)
[GCC 11.2.0] - discover and run doctests within a python package
positional arguments:
arg Ignored if optional arguments are specified, otherwise: Defaults --modname to arg.pop(0). Defaults --command to arg.pop(0). (default: None)
optional arguments:
-h, --help show this help message and exit
--version Display version info and quit (default: False)
-m MODNAME, --modname MODNAME
Module name or path. If specified positional modules are ignored (default: None)
-c COMMAND, --command COMMAND
A doctest name or a command (list|all|<callname>). Defaults to all (default: None)
--style {auto,google,freeform}
Choose the style of doctests that will be parsed (default: auto)
--analysis {auto,static,dynamic}
How doctests are collected (default: auto)
--durations DURATIONS
Specify execution times for slowest N tests.N=0 will show times for all tests (default: None)
--time Same as if durations=0 (default: False)
--colored COLORED Enable or disable ANSI coloration in stdout (default: True)
--nocolor Disable ANSI coloration in stdout
--offset If True formatted source linenumbers will agree with their location in the source file. Otherwise they will be relative to the doctest itself. (default:
False)
--report {none,cdiff,ndiff,udiff,only_first_failure}
Choose another output format for diffs on xdoctest failure (default: udiff)
--options OPTIONS Default directive flags for doctests (default: None)
--global-exec GLOBAL_EXEC
Custom Python code to execute before every test (default: None)
--verbose VERBOSE Verbosity level. 0 is silent, 1 prints out test names, 2 additionally prints test stdout, 3 additionally prints test source (default: 3)
--quiet sets verbosity to 1
--silent sets verbosity to 0
Zero-args runner ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The native interface has a "zero-args" mode in the
xdoctest
runner. This allows you to run functions in your modules
via the command line as long as they take no arguments. The purpose is
to create a quick entry point to functions in your code (because
xdoctest
is taking the space in the __main__
block).
For example, you might create a module mymod.py
with the following
code:
.. code:: python
def myfunc():
print('hello world')
if __name__ == '__main__':
import xdoctest
xdoctest.doctest_module(__file__)
Even though myfunc
has no doctest it can still be run using the
command python -m mymod myfunc
.
Note, even though "zero-arg" functions can be run via this interface
they are not run by python -m mymod all
, nor are they listed by
python -m mymod list
.
However, if you are doing this often, you may be better served by fire <https://github.com/google/python-fire>
__.
The main enhancements xdoctest
offers over doctest
are:
>>>
. There is
no need for the developer to differentiate between PS1
and
PS2
lines. However, old-style doctests where PS2
lines are
prefixed with ...
are still valid.# doctest: +SKIP
) can now applied
to an entire block (by placing it one the line above), in addition to having
it just apply to a single line (by placing it in-line at the end).async code at the top level <https://xdoctest.readthedocs.io/en/latest/manual/async_doctest.html>
__.See code in dev/_compare/demo_enhancements.py
for a demo that illustrates
several of these enhancements. This demo shows cases where xdoctest
works
but doctest
fails. As of version 0.9.1, there are no known syntax backwards
incompatability. Please submit an issue if you can find any backwards
incompatible cases.
Here is an example demonstrating the new relaxed (and backwards-compatible) syntax:
.. code:: python
def func():
"""
# Old way
>>> def func():
... print('The old regex-based parser required specific formatting')
>>> func()
The old regex-based parser required specific formatting
# New way
>>> def func():
>>> print('The new ast-based parser lets you prefix all lines with >>>')
>>> func()
The new ast-based parser lets you prefix all lines with >>>
"""
.. code:: python
def func():
"""
# Old way
>>> print('''
... It would be nice if we didnt have to deal with prefixes
... in multiline strings.
... '''.strip())
It would be nice if we didnt have to deal with prefixes
in multiline strings.
# New way
>>> print('''
Multiline can now be written without prefixes.
Editing them is much more natural.
'''.strip())
Multiline can now be written without prefixes.
Editing them is much more natural.
# This is ok too
>>> print('''
>>> Just prefix everything with >>> and the doctest should work
>>> '''.strip())
Just prefix everything with >>> and the doctest should work
"""
There are currently two main doctest parsing styles: google
and
freeform
, as well as a third style: auto
, which is a hybrid.
The parsing style can be set via the --style
command line argument in the
Xdoctest CLI, or via the --xdoctest-style
if using pytest.
Setting --style=google
(or --xdoctest-style=google
in pytest) enables
google-style parsing.
A Google-style <https://sphinxcontrib-napoleon.readthedocs.io>
__ doctest is
expected to exist in Google "docblock" with an Example:
or Doctest:
tag. All code in this block is parsed out as a single doctest.
Setting --style=freeform
(or --xdoctest-style=freeform
in pytest) enables
freeform-style parsing.
A freeform style doctest is any contiguous block of lines prefixed by >>>
.
This is the original parsing style of the builtin doctest module. Each block is
listed as its own test.
By default Xdoctest sets --style=auto
(or --xdoctest-style=auto
in
pytest) which will pull all google-style blocks out as single doctests, while
still all other >>>
prefixed code out as a freeform doctest.
The new got/want tester is very permissive by default; it ignores differences in whitespace, tries to normalize for python 2/3 Unicode/bytes differences, ANSI formatting, and it uses the old doctest ELLIPSIS fuzzy matcher by default. If the "got" text matches the "want" text at any point, the test passes.
Currently, this permissiveness is not highly configurable as it was in
the original doctest module. It is an open question as to whether or not
this module should support that level of configuration. If the test
requires a high degree of specificity in the got/want checker, it may
just be better to use an assert
statement.
There are no known syntax incompatibilities with original doctests. This is
based on running doctests on real life examples in boltons
, ubelt
,
networkx
, pytorch
, and on a set of extensive testing suite. Please
raise an issue or submit a merge/pull request if you find any incompatibility.
Despite full syntax backwards compatibility, there some runtime
incompatibilities by design. Specifically, Xdoctest enables a different set of
default directives, such that the "got"/"want" checker is more permissive.
Thus, a test that fails in doctest
based on a "got"/"want" check, may pass
in xdoctest
. For this reason it is recommended that you rely on coded
assert
-statements for system-critical code. This also makes it much easier
to transform your xdoctest
into a unittest
when you realize your
doctests are getting too long.
XDoctest is a good demonstration of itself. After pip installing xdoctest, try running xdoctest on xdoctest.
.. code:: bash
xdoctest xdoctest
If you would like a slightly less verbose output, try
.. code:: bash
xdoctest xdoctest --verbose=1
# or
xdoctest xdoctest --verbose=0
You could also consider running xdoctests tests through pytest:
.. code:: bash
pytest $(python -c 'import xdoctest, pathlib; print(pathlib.Path(xdoctest.__file__).parent)') --xdoctest
If you would like a slightly more verbose output, try
.. code:: bash
pytest -s --verbose --xdoctest-verbose=3 --xdoctest $(python -c 'import xdoctest, pathlib; print(pathlib.Path(xdoctest.__file__).parent)')
If you ran these commands, the myriad of characters that flew across your screen are lots more examples of what you can do with doctests.
.. |CircleCI| image:: https://circleci.com/gh/Erotemic/xdoctest.svg?style=svg :target: https://circleci.com/gh/Erotemic/xdoctest .. |Travis| image:: https://img.shields.io/travis/Erotemic/xdoctest/main.svg?label=Travis%20CI :target: https://travis-ci.org/Erotemic/xdoctest .. |Appveyor| image:: https://ci.appveyor.com/api/projects/status/github/Erotemic/xdoctest?branch=main&svg=True :target: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/Erotemic/xdoctest/branch/main .. |Codecov| image:: https://codecov.io/github/Erotemic/xdoctest/badge.svg?branch=main&service=github :target: https://codecov.io/github/Erotemic/xdoctest?branch=main .. |Pypi| image:: https://img.shields.io/pypi/v/xdoctest.svg :target: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/xdoctest .. |PypiDownloads| image:: https://img.shields.io/pypi/dm/xdoctest.svg :target: https://pypistats.org/packages/xdoctest .. |CondaDownloads| image:: https://anaconda.org/conda-forge/xdoctest/badges/downloads.svg :target: https://anaconda.org/conda-forge/xdoctest .. |ReadTheDocs| image:: https://readthedocs.org/projects/xdoctest/badge/?version=latest :target: https://xdoctest.readthedocs.io .. |GithubActions| image:: https://github.com/Erotemic/xdoctest/actions/workflows/tests.yml/badge.svg?branch=main :target: https://github.com/Erotemic/xdoctest/actions?query=branch%3Amain