I updated the expectations of the "union > nested" test, as I think they are incorrect.
My understanding is that unionAll is supposed to have inner join semantics, similar to forEach. This means that if an expression is not matched, the resource should be dropped from the result.
I updated the expectations of the "union > nested" test, as I think they are incorrect.
My understanding is that
unionAll
is supposed to have inner join semantics, similar toforEach
. This means that if an expression is not matched, the resource should be dropped from the result.