Generated RDF is not completely correct, because of the issue with IRIs that I have pointed out. Links are ok as well, although we understand the difficulty of finding too many links in this context. The use of PPROC is not complete, with some properties that you needed to add that were really in the ontology, although this required a further understanding.
You obtain a grade of 7 over 10 in this part of the evaluation
Sorry, I'm not particularly sure what you mean. I know I seem to have missed a slash between prefix and department, is that the correct one?
Sorry, I'm not particularly sure what you mean. I know I seem to have missed a slash between prefix and department, is that the correct one?
prefix: ... dp: http://dbpedia.org/ontology ...
s: dp:/Department#$(Department Name)
Regarding the use of UNSPSC, we discussed it before because if you add the name directly, its URI will look very strange or ugly. Because the name directly has a lot of spaces, like this. “http://contsem.unizar.es/def/sector-publico/pproc#PAPER%2CCOPY%2C20%20LB%2C8-1%2F2%22%20X%2011%22%2CWHT http://xmlns.com/foaf/ 0.1/name> "PAPER,COPY,20 LB,8-1/2" X 11",WHT"^^http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string.”