Open jpiesing opened 3 years ago
thanks, will do can you run the same on https://refapp.hbbtv.org/videos/02_gran_dillama_1080p_ma_25f75g6sv5/drm/manifest.mpd as well? I think what we've initially tested is the "HbbTV" box ticked.
thanks, will do can you run the same on https://refapp.hbbtv.org/videos/02_gran_dillama_1080p_ma_25f75g6sv5/drm/manifest.mpd as well?
One representation is below. Others are similar.
I think what we've initially tested is the "HbbTV" box ticked.
IMHO ticking only the HbbTV box only checks the specific requirements in the HbbTV spec. That's why I tick other boxes as well.
Work on-going. Re-test with new validator and content.
Needs re-running against the new and improved DASH validator v2.2
@Murmur feel free to contact my colleague @nicholas-fr as he's using this with the CTA WAVE test content.
https://beta.conformance.dashif.org/ https://refapp.hbbtv.org/videos/00_llama_h264_v8/manifest_1080p_24s.mpd https://refapp.hbbtv.org/videos/00_llama_h264_v8/cenc/manifest_1080p_24s.mpd
[x]cmaf, [x]hbbtv, [x]latest xsd
manifest is all green.
[x]cmaf, [x]hbbtv, [x]latest xsd, [x]segment validation
segments have few issues.
cmaf: AAC_LC invalid level
No idea at the moment why gives this error, it's aac_lc track encoded in ffmpeg tool.cmaf: All CMAF Tracks in a CMAF Switching Set SHALL conform to one CMAF Media Profile
text points to representation indexes not found in a manifest, no idea at the moment why, need to ask validator team.
I ran the DASH-IF validator on https://refapp.hbbtv.org/videos/02_gran_dillama_1080p_ma_25f75g6sv4/manifest.mpd with most of the boxes ticked. It wasn't at all happy.
Please review these & form an opinion which are reasonable and which are bugs.