This repository releases the source code for the paper:
Large language models (LLMs) inevitably exhibit hallucinations since the accuracy of generated texts cannot be secured solely by the parametric knowledge they encapsulate. Although retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is a practicable complement to LLMs, it relies heavily on the relevance of retrieved documents, raising concerns about how the model behaves if retrieval goes wrong. To this end, we propose the Corrective Retrieval Augmented Generation (CRAG) to improve the robustness of generation. Specifically, a lightweight retrieval evaluator is designed to assess the overall quality of retrieved documents for a query, returning a confidence degree based on which different knowledge retrieval actions can be triggered. Since retrieval from static and limited corpora can only return sub-optimal documents, large-scale web searches are utilized as an extension for augmenting the retrieval results. Besides, a decompose-then-recompose algorithm is designed for retrieved documents to selectively focus on key information and filter out irrelevant information in them. CRAG is plug-and-play and can be seamlessly coupled with various RAG-based approaches. Experiments on four datasets covering short- and long-form generation tasks show that CRAG can significantly improve the performance of RAG-based approaches.
Note: We use Python 3.11 for CRAG To get started, install conda and run:
git clone https://github.com/HuskyInSalt/CRAG.git
conda create -n CRAG python=3.11
...
pip install -r requirements.txt
Run the following command to preprocess the dataset for questions and retrieval results. Specifically for PopQA, the label of each (question, passage) pair is also collected.
bash run_data_preprocess.sh
Run the following command to fine-tune the evaluator.
bash run_evaluator_training.sh
The training data is shared and can be downloaded, the method of label collection is similar to the test set preparation in scripts/data_process.py
.
Run the following command to gather knowledge for inference, including correct
, incorrect
and ambiguous
.
bash run_knowledge_preparation.sh
Specifically, you can also run the following commands individually.
According to the paper, we decompose the retrieval results and filter out irrelevant parts. Three modes are listed to decompose passages: fixed_num
, excerption
and selection
.
fixed_num
segments passages into a fixed number of words, 'excerption' segments passages based on the end of the sentences, while passages are not divided in selection
mode.
You can choose the mode by --decompose_mode
.
python internal_knowledge_preparation.py \
--model_path YOUR_EVALUATOR_PATH \
--input_queries ../data/$dataset/sources \
--input_retrieval ../data/$dataset/retrieved_psgs \
--decompose_mode selection \
--output_file ../data/$dataset/ref/correct
Question rewriting and web searching are proposed here, thus an openai_api_key and a search_key are required.
In this experiment, we utilized a third-party Google Search API platform for searching.
Two selective modes including wiki
and all
are available.
wiki
visits pages related to Wikipedia preferentially, while all
visit all pages equally.
python external_knowledge_preparation.py \
--model_path YOUR_EVALUATOR_PATH \
--input_queries ../data/$dataset/sources \
--openai_key $OPENAI_KEY \
--search_key $SEARCH_KEY \
--task $dataset --mode wiki\
--output_file ../data/$dataset/ref/incorrect
Run the following command to combine both correct and incorrect knowledge for ambiguous action.
python combined_knowledge_preparation.py \
--correct_path ../data/$dataset/ref/correct \
--incorrect_path ../data/$dataset/ref/incorrect \
--ambiguous_path ../data/$dataset/ref/ambiguous
Run the following command for CRAG inference.
bash run_crag_inference.sh
Run the following command for Self-CRAG data preparation.
bash run_selfcrag_preparation.sh
With this command, the retrieval results of the original input files of Self-RAG will be replaced by correct, incorrect and ambiguous context. Then follow the instructions at Self-RAG (Asai et al., 2023) for the ultimate results.
For Bio evaluation, please follow the instructions at the FactScore (Min et al., 2023) official repository.
python -m factscore.factscorer --data_path YOUR_OUTPUT_FILE --model_name retrieval+ChatGPT --cache_dir YOUR_CACHE_DIR --openai_key YOUR_OPEN_AI_KEY --verbose
It is worth mentioning that, previous FactScore adopted text-davinci-003 by default, which has been deprecated since 2024-01-04 and replaced by gpt-3.5-turbo-instruct. Both results of CRAG and Self-CRAG reported are based on the text-davinci-003, which may differ from the current gpt-3.5-turbo-instruct evaluation.
For the other datasets, run the following command.
bash run_eval.sh
e.g., PopQA
python eval.py \
--input_file eval_data/popqa_longtail_w_gs.jsonl \
--eval_file ../data/popqa/output/YOUR_OUTPUT_FILE \
--metric match
PubHealth
python eval.py \
--input_file eval_data/health_claims_processed.jsonl \
--eval_file ../data/pubqa/output/YOUR_OUTPUT_FILE \
--metric match --task fever
Arc_Challenge
python run_test_eval.py \
--input_file eval_data/arc_challenge_processed.jsonl \
--eval_file ../data/arc_challenge/output/YOUR_OUTPUT_FILE \
--metric match --task arc_c
If you think our work is helpful or use the code, please cite the following paper:
@article{yan2024corrective,
title={Corrective Retrieval Augmented Generation},
author={Yan, Shi-Qi and Gu, Jia-Chen and Zhu, Yun and Ling, Zhen-Hua},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.15884},
year={2024}
}