Open stobiblum opened 4 years ago
Hi @stobiblum,
I don't see anything obvious in the PEtab files. Can you do a gradient check (obj.check_gradient(p)
), to see if the gradients for the scalings are 0?
@LeonardSchmiester
The gradient for the scalings is not 0.
obj.check_grad(p)
yields for s_mRNA_Cyp1a1_1
-1.792550e+00
and for s_mRNA_AhRR_1
-4.339656e-03
.
Good morning,
I am using the pypesto 'feature_hierarchical' branch on a WSL. I tried the hierarchical estimation with a model including five observables with three scaling parameters, where everything went fine. However, when I used a larger dataset including 13 observables with 11 scaling parameters the estimation of some of the scaling parameters failed (The SBML and PEtab files are attached). Noise was not estimated in any of the cases.
AhR_hiera_more_data.zip
For estimation I used the analytical inner solver with following code:
As you can see in the plots below, some scaling parameters (namely s_mRNA_AhRR_1 and s_mRNA_Cyp1a1_1) are not estimated correctly. If I manually increase s_mRNA_Cyp1a1_1 from 3.496 to 6.233 the fval decreases from 6526.812775823983 to 6314.67373801991. If I manually increase s_mRNA_AhRR_1 from 0.353 to 5.729 the fval decreases from 6526.812775823983 to 6303.173798458569.
Do you have any idea what is causing the problem?
Thank you in advance!