TML (Tau Meta-Language) is a variant of Datalog. It is intended to serve as a translator between formal languages (and more uses, see under the Philosophy section). The main difference between TML and common Datalog implementations is that TML works under the Partial Fixed-Point (PFP) semantics, unlike common implementations that follow the Well-Founded Semantics (WFS) or stratified Datalog. By that TML (like with WFS) imposes no syntactic restrictions on negation, however unlike WFS or stratified Datalog it is PSPACE complete rather than P complete. TML's implementation heavily relies on BDDs (Binary Decision Diagrams) in its internals. This gives it extraordinary performance in time and space terms, and allowing negation to be feasible even over large universes. In fact negated bodies, as below, do not consume more time or space than positive bodies by any means, thanks to the BDD mechanism.
The size of the universe (or domain of discourse) of a TML program is:
TML follows the PFP semantics in the following sense. On each step, all rules
are executed once and only once, causing a set of insertions and deletions of
terms. If the same term is inserted and deleted at the same step, the program
halts and evaluates to unsat. Otherwise it continues to the next step
performing again a single evaluation of every rule. This process must eventually
halt in either of the following forms:
The database obtained from the current step is equal to the database resulted from the previous step. This is a Fixed-Point. When this happens, the resulted database is considered as the final result.
Or, the database obtained in one step equals to the database state in some
previous, not immediate predecessor, state. In this case the program will loop
forever if we wouldn't detect it and halt the program, and is therefore
evaluated to unsat, as no fixed point exists.
Note that only one of the two options can happen because the arity and the universe size are fixed. Ultimately, for universe size n and maximum arity k, they will occur in no more than 2^n^k steps.
A TML program consists of initial terms (facts) and rules that instruct the interpreter which terms to derive or delete at each step, as described in the previous section.
Facts take the form of
a(b c).
a(b(c)).
a(1 2 3).
rel('t' 1 2).
b(?x).
r.Each term begins with a relation symbol (which is not considered as part of the
universe). It is then possibly followed by parenthesis (or any balanced sequence
of them) containing symbols. A term like b(b) is understood as containing two
different symbols, one b stands for a relation symbol, and the second one for
a universe element. Symbols may either be alphanumeric literals (not beginning
with a digit), or a nonzero integer, or a character. Additionally a term may
contain variables, prefixed with ?. A fact that contain variables,
like b(?x), is interpreted where ?x goes over the whole universe. So the
program
a(1).
b(?x).is equivalent to
a(1).
b(0).
b(1).Rules are terms separated by commas and one update operator :-. For example:
e(?x ?y) :- e(?x ?z), e(?z ?y).what is left to the update operator (which may be several terms separated by
commas) is called the head of the rule, while the rhs is called the body
of the rule. This latter example therefore instructs to add to the next-step
database all facts of the form e(?x ?y) such that e(?x ?z) and e(?x, ?y) appear
in the current-step database, for some value of ?z. So for example the following
program
e(1 2).
e(2 1).
e(?x ?y) :- e(?x ?z), e(?z ?y).will result with:
e(1 2).
e(2 1).
e(1 1).
e(2 2).Note that the order of facts and rules does not matter. Also note that all facts and rules must end with a dot.
Bodies may be negated using the negation symbol ~, for example:
e(?x ?y) :- e(?x ?z), e(?z ?y), ~e(?x ?x).The variable ?x will bind to all values such that e(?x ?x) does not appear in the current-step database.
Heads may also contain the negation symbol, in which case it is interpreted as deletion. For example the rule:
~e(?x ?x) :- e(?x ?x).Will make the next-step database to not include all terms of the form e(?x ?x) included on the current step database.
For performance reasons it is advised to better not have variables appearing in negated bodies that do not occur in any positive head (in the same rule), or variables that appear in positive heads and do not appear in bodies (also in the same rule). However this is only a performance advice. TML should work correctly either way, where variables (implicitly) range over the whole universe.
It is also possible to use negated facts. These are deleted right after non-negated facts are added and right before rules are being executed.
a(2). b(?x).
~b(1). ~a(?x).
a_copy(?x) :- a(?x).
b_copy(?x) :- b(?x).will result with
b(2).
b(0).
b_copy(2).
b_copy(0).It is possible to sequence programs one after the other using curly brackets. For example the program
{
e(1 2).
e(2 3).
e(3 1).
e(?x ?y) :- e(?x ?z), e(?z ?y).
}
{
~e(?x ?x) :- e(?x ?x).
}will result with
e(1 2).
e(1 3).
e(2 1).
e(2 3).
e(3 1).
e(3 2).More generally, the output of one program is considered the input of the other. It is possible to filter the output before passing it to the next program as in the section "Queries".
It is possible to nest programs (actually whole sequences). Any nested program (or sequence of nested programs) is evaluated after the parent program reaches its fixed point.
For example this nested program:
{
x1 :- x.
{ y.
{ x2 :- x. }
{ y2 :- y. }
{ z2 :- z. }
}
y1 :- y.
{ y.
x2 :- x.
{ z.
x3 :- x.
y3 :- y.
z3 :- z.
}
y2 :- y.
z2 :- z.
}
z1 :- z.
x.
}is equivalent to this sequence:
{
x.
x1 :- x.
y1 :- y.
z1 :- z.
}
{ y. }
{ x2 :- x. }
{ y2 :- y. }
{ z2 :- z. }
{
y.
x2 :- x.
y2 :- y.
z2 :- z.
}
{
z.
x3 :- x.
y3 :- y.
z3 :- z.
}It is possible to input strings to the database. The line
@string mystr "abc".will add following facts to the database:
c(2).
b(1).
a(0).
mystr(2 'c').
mystr(1 'b').
mystr(0 'a').
mystr(printable 2 0).
mystr(printable 1 0).
mystr(printable 0 0).
mystr(alnum 2 0).
mystr(alnum 1 0).
mystr(alnum 0 0).
mystr(alpha 2 0).
mystr(alpha 1 0).
mystr(alpha 0 0).More generally, @string relname "str" will use the relation symbol relname
to declare two relations with that name:
mystr(?pos ?char) with a character and its position in the string@string directive also declares unary relation for each unique character of the string and stores in it all character positions.
It is also possible to output a string to stdout by using it as a relation
symbol:
@stdout str1.In addition a string can refer to command line arguments:
@string str $1.or to be taken from stdin:
@string str stdin.or from a file:
@string str <filename>.or from a file provided as a command line argument:
@string str <$1>.Finally it is possible to refer to the length of the string by the symbol
len:str.
TML features three kinds of queries: filtering, proving, and tree extraction. Filtering and tree extraction replace the resulted database with their result, namely deleting everything unrelated to them. Their result is then outputed or passed to the next sequenced program.
Filtering is done by:
! e(1 ?x).which will leave on the database only the results that match the term e(1 ?x).
Tree extraction is done by supplying the root (which may possibly contain
variables) after !!:
!! T((?x ?y)).Proof extraction is done by adding a single directive specifying a relation name:
@trace relname.which will construct a forest with relation symbol relname that contains
all possible witnesses to all derived facts, in a fashion that was described
above: if we have a rule
e(?x ?y) :- e(?x ?z), e(?y ?z).
@trace P.then the trace tree will have the form
P((e(?x ?y)) (e(?x ?z)) (e(?y ?z))).It is possible to supply a context free grammar as a syntactic shortcut for definite clause grammars. For example Dyck's language may be written as:
start => null.
start => '(' start ')' start.and will be converted to the rules:
start(?v1 ?v1) :- str(((?v1)) (?v2) ((?v3))).
start(?v3 ?v3) :- str(((?v1)) (?v2) ((?v3))).
start(?v1 ?v5) :- str(((?v1)) ('(') ((?v2))), start(?v2 ?v3),
str(((?v3)) (')') ((?v4))), start(?v4 ?v5).where str is some string defined in the program. Grammars are allowed in
programs that contain only one string. If multiple strings require parsing it
is possible to define them in sequenced programs.
Extracting the parse forest can be done by extracting a proof of the start symbol:
!! parseForest start(0, len:str).which also defines the start symbol.
The grammar supports fow now the builtins alpha, alnum, digit, printable
, and space. For example a sequence of one or more whitespaces can be defined
by the productions
ws => space ws1.
ws1 => space ws1.
ws1 => null.TML allows using macro that can be expanded internally. To define macro, := is used. For example, atc macro is defined as:
e(1 2).
e(2 3).
e(3 4).
atc(?a ?b ?c) := e(?a ?b), e(?b ?c).
tc(?x ?y ?z) :- atc(?x ?y ?z).This will expand to tc to
tc(?x ?y ?z) :- e(?x ?y), e(?y ?z)The variables in the body of the macro are replaced with that at the point of call, and then the body is expanded.
Another variation is where the variables are partially specified in the macro term, that itself is an argument.
atc(?a ?b ) := e(?a ?b).
ttc(?x ?y) :- ntc(atc(?x)).
ntc(?a ).This will expand macro atc as
ttc(?x ?y) :-
ntc(?0f10),
e(?x ?0f10).Here a new fresh variable ?0f10 is introduced.
TML grammar can take EBNF syntax as well. It supports { } for zero or more occurrence, [ ] for optional, and ( ) for grouping terms. Further * and + are postfix operators that can be applied.
@string str "aabbccdd".
A => ('a')*.
B => 'b'+.
C => 'c'*.
D => 'd''d'
start => A B C DHere 'a' can occur zero or more times and 'b' can occur one or more time. Internally, TML shall replace it with fresh production symbols that would do recursion. A more complex example is
A => { [ 'a' { [ 'a' ] } [ 'f' ] ] } .
C => 'c' + .
B => 'b' [ B ] . # B occurs one or zero time.
D => ( 'd' 'd' ) * . # ( ) allows * operator to be applied to all terms as a whole.
start => A * B + C * D + | A + ( B * ) .
K => ( C + ) * [ B + ] .TML allows adding constraints to a simple grammar production. These constraints refer to the properties of symbols through their relative position in the right hand side, starting from 1. Internally, TML translates them into terms. There are two types of constraints supported .
Example 1: Consider the following grammar.
@string str "aabbcc".
A => 'a' A 'b' | "ab" .
C => 'c'C .
C => 'c' .
start => A C , len(2) + len(2) = len(1) .Here the constraints are specified for S production where the length of the derived string from A should be twice the length derived from C. Note that due to constraints it would not accept "abc".
Example 2 Another example using string comparison.
@string str "cccaccc".
C => 'c' C .
C => 'c' | 'z'.
A => 'a' A | 'a'.
start => C A C, substr(1) = substr(3), len(2) = 1.Here the derived content of both Cs should match.
It is possible to supply a first order formula which is then transformed into a TML program. The valid symbols are:
&&, ||, ->, <-> and ~ for negation.{ , } for matrix and sub-formula specification.+, <, =. Attaching a formula to the head of a rule will make true in case of satisfiability otherwise false.
Example 1:
A(0).
A(1).
B(0).
ALL_B_IS_A(1) :- forall ?x { B(?x) -> A(?x) }.
will result with:
ALL_B_IS_A(1).Additionally, if variables are set on the head, besides checking satisfiability TML will evaluate the solution for such formula.
Example 2:
A2(1 0).
A2(1 1).
B2(1 0).
B2(1 1).
B2(0 1).
AND_B2_A2(?x ?y) :- { B2(?x ?y) && A2(?y ?x) }.
will result with:
AND_B2_A2(1 1).
AND_B2_A2(0 1).Notice that variables in the head of the rule are existentially quantified, so above formula is equivalent to:
ALL_B2_IS_A2(?y ?x) :- exists ?x exists ?y { B2(?x ?y) -> A2(?y ?x) }.TML first order logic also allows to set arithmetic constraints to the variables by a conjunction with an arithmetic expression as below.
Example 3:
s0(0).
s1(1).
s2(2).
A(?x ?y) :- { s2(?x) && ?x + 1 = ?y } .
B(?v1 ?v3) :- exists ?v2 { A(?v2 ?v3) && s1(?v1) && ?v1 + 1 = ?v2 } .
will result with:
A(2 3).
B(1 3).TML currently provide support for integer addition and multiplication. It also includes support for bitwise boolean operations (AND, OR, XOR, NOT) and shift operations (SHL, SHR). Additionally the arithmetic primitives are defined in two modes: (1) pre-computed and (2) ad-hoc, according to how they are computed.
?x op ?y = ?z where op can be +, *, &, |, ^, <<, >>.
The range for the arguments is (0,MAX) where MAX is equal to the maximum number in the program.
Pre-computed stands for how TML is actually handling the unification of the arithmetic relationship with the values of the arguments; starting with a global relationship for any possible value in the universe it will get constrained depending on the arguments.Example 1:
U(4).
A(1).
A(3).
adder_0(?x ?y ?z) :- e(?x), e(?y), ?x + ?y = ?z.
adder_1(?x) :- e(?x), ?x + 1 = 3. # unsat
adder_2(?x) :- e(?x), ?x + 2 = 3.
output:
adder_0(3 1 4).
adder_0(1 3 4).
adder_0(1 1 2).
adder_2(1).This mode is the most expressive one, meaning that i.e. allows to solve equations like in rule setting adder_C in Example 1. It will be in general the most convenient one for programs involving any operation other than multiplication.
On the other hand, when doing multiplication with numbers larger than 2^10, pre-computed mode shows a performance bottleneck due a exponential execution time dependence on the number of bits. For this reason, an additional mode for arithmetic support has been developed.
Example 2:
U(15).
A(?x) :- ?x = 5.
B(?x) :- ?x <= 2.
adhoc_mult(?z) :- A(?x), B(?y), pw_mult(?x ?y ?z).
will result with:
ad_hoc_mult(10).
ad_hoc_mult(5).
ad_hoc_mult(0).Table below summarizes current arithmetic operator support:
| Operation | Pre-computed | Ad-hoc |
|---|---|---|
| addition | ?x + ?y = ?z | pw_add(?x ?y ?z) |
| multiplication | ?x * ?y = ?z | pw_mult(?x ?y ?z) |
| bitwise AND | ?x & ?y = ?z | bw_and(?x ?y ?z) |
| bitwise OR | ?x | ?y = ?z | bw_or(?x ?y ?z) |
| bitwise XOR | ?x ^ ?y = ?z | bw_xor(?x ?y ?z) |
| bitwise NOT | TBD | bw_not(?x ?z) |
| shift-left | ?x << const = ?z | - |
| shift-right | ?x >> const = ?z | - |
Finally, special attention deserves the precision of the arithmetic operations. By default they will operate modulo 2^n, where n is the number of bits required for MAX (maximum number in the program), this means that any overflow will be discarded.
Example 3:
U(7).
mult_mod8(?x) :- ?x * 2 = 2.
will result with:
mult_mod8(1).
mult_mod8(5).Alternatively, if the user requires extended precision to keep all information on the right side of the equality (the ?z variable in the examples above), both addition and multiplication can be used as below:
U(15).
ext_prec(?zh ?zl) :- ?x = 6, ?y = 4, ?x * ?y = ?zh ?zl.
will result with:
ext_prec(1 8). #notice: 1*2^4 + 8 = 24where ?zh accounts for the most significant bits (MSBs) of the operation and ?zl for the least significant bits (LSBs).
For getting number of records in a relation TML provides count builtin. It is usable in bodies. It has no input argument and it has one output argument which is the number of records matching rule's body.
Result of the count builtin is not accessible in the same rule's body, it can be only passed to terms in head. If it is necessary to use the count result in a body it has to be stored into the db first (use head term) and then the value can be accessed in a body in a next step.
Example:
A(1). A(2). A(3).
# wrong because ?l can be passed only to head
len_is_3 :- A(?x), count(?l), ?l = 3.
# length of A is stored in A_len and in another rule it is checked
A_len(?l) :- A(?x), count(?l).
len_is_3 :- A_len(?l), ?l = 3.TML programmer can enable fixed point step by -fp (-fp-step) command line
option. This option makes TML interpret to add a __fp__ fact into program's
database when it reaches a fixed point and it continues with execution until
another fixed point. If __fp__ fact exists in the database already it halts
the execution.
This way a TML programmer can have a rule depending on the __fp__ fact.
To continue execution of the program remove the __fp__ fact.
This fact is filtered out when printing the database data.
To enable or disable a rule we can use additional term in rule's body. Existence of such a term guards execution of the rule.
guard. # guard fact is required for execution of
a_copy(?x) :- a(?x), guard. # this ruleBy using -guards (-g) command line option we can transform a TML program
containing nested programs or if or while statements into a single TML
program which uses rule guards to control execution of each program's state.
To properly guard execution of nested programs it is required to transform
all statements into a guarded rule. Because adds, dels, rules execution, and
if and while conditions need to happen in a sequence we need to
transform each program into several consecutive states (N is an id of the
program): start state: __N__start__, adds state: __N__add__, deletions
state: __N__del__, rules state: __N__rule__, conditions state: __N__cond__
and a fixed point state: __N__fp__.
__N__start state is the beginning state of the program if it is a while
guarded program, so its execution can be breaken before other states of the
program happen. if the program is guarded by while it also adds a
__N__curr__ fact. This fact guards the breaking condition of the while
command.
Not all states are always present in each program.
Program containing an adding of a fact will have __N__add__ state.
If program contains a deletion of a fact it will have __N__del__ state.
Program with at least a rule will have __N__rule__ state.
If there is an if condition it will have __N__cond__ state.
Program guarded by a while condition will have __N__start__ state and it
will also keep the __N__curr__ fact existing while the program is running.
So far only __N__fp__ is the only state which is always present even in an
empty program. (It is expected that this state would be optimized out too.)
Transitioning from one state to another is done by state transitioning rules:
~__previous_state__, __new_state__ :- __previous_state__.All program states take only a single step of the resulting TML program but the
__N__rule__ state. Rules state needs to run until the current program
(rules guarded by __N__rule__) reaches its fixed point.
To detect a fixed point of the program (in __N__rule__ state) programatically
we enable the fp step (-g enables
-fp automatically) feature.
With __fp__ internal fact we can detect fixed point of a nested program and we
can end the __N__rule__ state and continue to the __N__fp__ state:
~__1__rule__, __1__fp__, ~__fp__ :- __1__rule__, __fp__.The last state of the program is __N__fp__ state. Existence of this fact
guards execution of the program which follows in the sequence.
Example: a simple program
fact1, fact2.
~fact2.
rule1 :- fact1.becomes:
__0__fp__. # initial state of a TML program
fact1, fact2 :- __1__add__.
~fact2 :- __1__del__.
rule1 :- __1__rule__, fact1.
~__0__fp__, __1__add__ :- __0__fp__.
~__1__add__, __1__del__ :- __1__add__.
~__1__del__, __1__rule__ :- __1__del__.
~__1__rule__, __1__fp__, ~__fp__ :- __1__rule__, __fp__.
~__1__fp__ :- __1__fp__.A nested program:
{ a(3). { a(2). } a(1). }transforms into:
__0__fp__.
~__0__fp__, __1__fp__ :- __0__fp__.
~__1__fp__ :- __1__fp__.
a(3) :- __2__add__.
a(1) :- __2__add__.
~__1__fp__, __2__add__ :- __1__fp__.
~__2__add__, __2__fp__ :- __2__add__.
~__2__fp__ :- __2__fp__.
a(2) :- __3__add__.
~__2__fp__, __3__add__ :- __2__fp__.
~__3__add__, __3__fp__ :- __3__add__.
~__3__fp__ :- __3__fp__.To see the -g transformed program use -t command line option.
Guard transformation also enables usage of if and while statements. First order formula is used as a condition. Guarded code is always nested eventhough it does not have to be surrounded by '{' and '}' if it is just a single rule or another guarding statement.
Syntax of if statement is:
if FORM then STATEMENT. # or
if FORM then STATEMENT else STATEMENT.FORM is a first order formula and STATEMENT can be another guarding statement,
a nested program or a rule (note that STATEMENT is always nested. It is parsed
as a nested program, ie. rule. is parsed as { rule. }).
Example program:
A(10).
if exists ?x { A(?x) } then A_not_empty. else { A_empty. }is equivalent to:
A(10).
if exists ?x { A(?x) } then { A_not_empty. } else A_empty.produces result:
A(10).
A_not_empty.if is implemented by transformation of a condition (FO formula) into a rule which is executed (condition is decided) when fp of the current program is reached.
For above example such a rule would be.
__1__2__guard__ :- { __1__cond__ && { exists ?x { A(?x) } } }.Execution of each respective (true/false) nested program block is guarded by
existence or non-existence of the __1__2__guard.
Full example program transformed:
__0__fp__.
A(10) :- __1__add__.
~__0__fp__, __1__add__ :- __0__fp__.
~__1__add__, __1__cond__ :- __1__add__.
~__1__cond__, __1__fp__ :- __1__cond__.
~__1__fp__ :- __1__fp__.
A_not_empty :- __2__add__.
~__1__2__guard__, __2__add__ :- __1__fp__, __1__2__guard__.
~__2__add__, __2__fp__ :- __2__add__.
~__2__fp__ :- __2__fp__.
A_empty :- __3__add__.
__3__add__ :- __1__fp__, ~__1__2__guard__.
~__3__add__, __3__fp__ :- __3__add__.
~__3__fp__ :- __3__fp__.
__1__2__guard__
:- { __1__cond__ && { exists ?x { A(?x) } } }.Syntax of while statement:
while FORM do STATEMENT.FORM is a first order formula and STATEMENT can be another guarding statement, a nested program or a rule.
Example program:
a(0). a(1). a(2). a(3). a(4).
i(0).
while ~ { b(1) } do {
b(?x), i(?x1), ~a(?x), ~i(?x) :-
a(?x), i(?x), ?x + 1 = ?x1.
}outputs following
a(4).
a(3).
i(3).
b(2).
b(1).
b(0).Note that while the guard rule for the if statement is executed when the parent program enters its fixed point state, condition of the while statement is checked each step of the nested program even before the add state.
while condition is negated into a breaking rule. When the rule becomes true it breaks the execution of the current program and reaches the fixed point.
Condition ~ { b(1) } is transformed into this breaking rule:
~__2__curr__, ~__2__start__, ~__2__rule__, __2__fp__
:- { __2__curr__ && ~ ~ { b(1) } }.Full transformation of the above program:
__0__fp__.
a(0), a(1), a(2), a(3), a(4), i(0) :- __1__add__.
~__0__fp__, __1__add__ :- __0__fp__.
~__1__add__, __1__fp__ :- __1__add__.
~__1__fp__ :- __1__fp__.
b(?x), i(?x1), ~a(?x), ~i(?x)
:- a(?x), i(?x), ?x+1=?x1, __2__rule__.
~__1__fp__, __2__start__, __2__curr__ :- __1__fp__.
~__2__start__, __2__rule__ :- __2__start__.
~__2__rule__, ~__fp__, __2__fp__ :- __2__rule__, __fp__.
~__2__curr__ :- __2__fp__, __2__curr__.
~__2__fp__ :- __2__fp__.
~__2__curr__, ~__2__start__, ~__2__rule__, __2__fp__
:- { __2__curr__ && ~ ~ { b(1) } }.To make TML code more structured and readable for a programmer we provide a structure called state block.
To enable this structure use: --state-blocks or -sb command line option.
Syntax of this structure is:
[state_name:
#...code to be executed while state_name is active...
]State block structure allows to group parts of a program which are supposed to run only when some state is active. State blocks can be nested.
This feature is implemented by a simple transformation where every fact or rule inside a state block is converted into a rule guarded by the name of the state.
Example:
ok.
state1. # enable `state1`
[state1:
fact_to_be_added_when_state1_is_active.
rule_to_be_executed_when_state1_is_active :- ok.
]... is transformed into a program:
ok.
state1.
fact_to_be_added_when_state1_is_active :- state1.
rule_to_be_executed_when_state1_is_active :- ok, state1. Sometimes it is required to have a state which lasts only a single step.
We can call these states flipping states.
You can make a flipping state by adding ~ after the state block name.
This change will cause the state to be disabled right in a next step.
Example:
flipping. # enable state `flipping`
[flipping~:
this_rule_gets_executed :- only_once.
]... is transformed into:
flipping.
~flipping :- flipping.
this_rule_gets_executed :- only_once, flipping.See more examples of state blocks in regression tests directory
One can specify types for arguments of terms and predicates in the program. There are three primitive types "int", "char" and "sym" with default size of 4 bits each. The int can be further specialized with bit size like int:2, which says it is a type which holds only 2 bits ( possible four values).
The predicates type signature can be specified with keyword predtype preceding relation/predicate name and by including types of the arguments as in example,
predtype father( sym ?b).
record edge (int:3 ?c, int:2 ?c ).
record pair(int ?a, char ?b).
Here, father predicate can take argument of type sym, symbols. "edge" takes first argument of type 3 bit size and second as type 2 bits size.
The type checking will check for various type errors in the TML program for example. Running following program with "tml --bitunv " option will invoke the typechecking on the TML rules. ( the flage option would be removed in future, though currently specific)
The following program has type mismatch for ?x in first rule. Running it with -bitunv option produces error
predtype e( int:5 ?a, int:5 ?b).
predtype tc( int:6 ?a, int:5 ?b).
e(1 2 ).
tc(?x ?y) :- e(?x ?z), tc(?z ?y).
tc(?x ?y) :- e(?x ?y).
Type error: "Type int:6 of ?x does not match expected type int:5 in predicate e(?x ?z)" close to "?x ?z), tc(?z ?y)."Here ?x has expected type of int:6 as per "tc" signature, while int:5 as per "e". This results in type mismatch.
One can specify complex types with struct key word like.
struct person {
char ?y.
int ?age.
}.The total size of this person type is now the sum of all primitive types. One can also nest struct within a struct type like this.
struct address {
int ?num
person ?p.
}.At the moment, the individual members of struct are not accessible (in future).
Other examples of type errors are wrong arity, undefined types, exceeding max bit sizes etc. For example, for program below, we get
struct sttyp2 {
char ?y.
sttyp2 ?recursive_not_Allowed.
}
struct styp {
int:2 ?c, ?z .
sttyp2 ?inner, ?in3.
}
predtype father( sym ?b).
predtype canFly( sym ?c ).
predtype edge (int:3 ?c, int:2 ?c ).
predtype night( int:2 ?A).
predtype pair(int ?a, char ?b).
predtype school ( undeftype ?name, sttyp2 ?l ).
father(fff wrongargcount).
#father(Tom Amy).
canFly(bird).
#canFly("bird").
edge('c' 1). # typemismatch
night(4). # It's night.
pair(1 2). # typemismatch
edge(?x ?y) :- edge(?x ?z), edge(?z ?y).
school( notyet notyet).
Type error: "Expected arity for father(fff wrongargcount) is 1" close to "father(fff wrongargcount)."
Type error: "Expected type for argument 1:c is int:3 in predicate edge('c' 1)"
Type error: "Expected type for argument 2:2 is char in predicate pair(1 2)" close to "2). # typemismatch"
Type error: "Type int:2 of ?z does not match expected type int:3 in predicate edge(?z ?y)" close to "?z ?y)."
Type error: "Type undeftype of notyet is undefined" close to "notyet notyet)."
Type error: "4 exceeds max size for int:2 in predicate night(4)" close to "4). # It's night."
This Section lists the optimizations that could be performed in a TML program.
There are two kinds of optimizations: iteration and minmization. The first one deals with the computation of a new program that computes the iteration of the given program a given number of times. The second one deals with the minimization of the given program in order to be compute it faster, i.e. we take into account a cost function that computes the cost of each independant rule and try to minimize the overall cost.
Optimizations from previous versions of TML are subsumed by ones the consider above.
Each input program is executed symbolically the number of times required. The final result is a TML program that compute at once the results of the initial program afer the given number of iterations.
This optimization could be enabled using --iterate followed by the numbers of
times the procedure should be realized.
The resulting program could be oputput following the standar procedures using the
--dump parameter.
We minimized the program execution time extracting common parts from each pair of rules into new ones. To do so we use a CQC (Conjunctive Query Containment) using Z3 procedure.
The underlying procedure includes splitting of the rules (as we consider all the posible splitings of the rules).
The evaluated cost of each rule is given by the actual cost of computing the rule over a random sample of the intervining facts.
The procedure above described (intrincasilly) includes the rules splitting and factorication of previous versions of TML.
This optimization could be enabled using --minimize followed by the numbers of
times the procedure should be realized.
This option combines the above optimization into one. For each iteration of the procedure one iteration and one minimization is done.
This optimization could be enabled using --minimize-and-iterate followed by the numbers of
times the procedure should be realized.
The resulting program could be oputput following the standar procedures using the
--dump-minimize-and-iterate parameter.
The domain directive creates a domain over which a quoted program can be defined and executed. Conceptually it is necessary to allow quoted programs to manipulate terms of arbitrary arities without requiring changes/extensions to the quotation schema nor the quotation operator nor the evaluation operator. Concretely it is required to instantiate quotations, evaluators, and codecs.
This directive has the following syntax:
@domain <domain_sym> <limit_num> <arity_num>.. Here <domain_sym> is
the prefix that all relations generated for the domain should have.
<limit_num> is the tuple element domain size. And <arity_num> is the
maximum length of the tuples generated for this domain.
An example of usage:
@domain dom 7 3.The quote directive takes a literal TML program and creates a relation that when correctly interpreted produces the same facts that would have been produced by the literal program. Conceptually it is required to enable TML programs to manipulate and inspect other TML programs. Concretely it is required to instantiate evaluators.
This directive has the following syntax:
@quote <quote_sym> <domain_sym> <quote_str>. Here <quote_sym> is the
prefix that all relations generated for the quotation should have.
<domain_sym> is the domain over which arbitrary length fragments (like
terms) in the quotation are defined. Additionally the <limit_num> of
the domain must be more than or equal to the maximum number of distinct
variables used in a rule of <quote_str> because variables are encoded
as numbers. Also the <limit_num> of the domain must be more than the
largest number occuring in <quote_str>. Also, the <arity_num> of the
domain must be more than or equal to the maximum of the term arities
occuring in <quote_str> because term tuples are represented by lists.
(This setup is what allows us to encode arbitrary arity terms without
modifications to the schema.) <quote_str> is a literal TML program
surrounded in backquotes to quote.
An example of usage:
@quote quote dom `
u(0).
d(0).
c() :- forall ?x {u(?x) -> d(?x)}.`.Currently the quote operator only supports TML programs with facts, rules, and formulas utilizing only variables and numbers. There are plans to extend this to symbols, arithmetic, and eventually the rest of TML.
The evaluate directive takes a relation containing a quotation and a relation containing a domain and creates a relation containing the facts that would have been derived by the original program that was quoted. Conceptually it is required to see what the program represented by a (potentially statically unknown) relation would produce at runtime. Concretely it is required to instantiate codecs.
This directive has the following syntax:
@eval <eval_sym> <domain_sym> <quote_sym> <timeout_num>. Here
<eval_sym> is the prefix that all relations generated for the
interpreter should have. <domain_sym> is the relation name of the
domain representing the universe over which the quoted program should be
interpreted. <quote_sym> is the relation containing the quoted program
to run. Additionally, the <arity_num> of <domain_sym> must be more
than or equal to the maximum number of variables used by a rule in
<quote_sym> because the value of each variable is stored in a list
during interpretation. <timeout_num> is the number of steps of the quoted program
that should be simulated.
An example of usage:
@eval out dom quote 50.The codec directive takes a relation containing a domain, a relation containing an interpreter, and a maximum term arity; and produces a relation containing a decoding of the facts produced by the interpreter. Conceptually it is necessary because the evaluator's lack of dependence on specific arity maximums forces it to produce outputs that are encoded and hence are hard to debug/use.
This directive has the following syntax:
@codec <codec_sym> <domain_sym> <eval_sym> <arity_num>. Here
<codec_sym> is the prefix that all relations generated or the codec
should have. <domain_sym> is the relation name of the domain that will
be used to decode the encoded outputs of an evaluator. <eval_sym> is
the relation name of the evaluator whose outputs are being decoded.
<arity_num> is the maximum arity of the terms being decoded.
An example of usage:
@codec cdc dom out 3.Comments are either C-style / \/ multiline comments, or # to comment till the end of the line.
TBD
TBD