search

ITISFoundation / osparc-issues

🐼 issue-only repo for the osparc project
3 stars 5 forks source link

Dataset 4 doesn't have CC by 4.0 license. #175

Closed KZzizzle closed 4 years ago

KZzizzle commented 4 years ago
Please leave your contact information

Name Sue Tappan

Email susan@mbfbioscience.com

Can you provide a short description of what you were doing? browsing data & Simulations

Can you provide specific and detailed description? Dataset 4 doesn't have CC by 4.0 license. how come? https://sparc.science/datasets/4?type=simulation

How would you like the experience to improve? all SPARC data is supposed to be CC by 4, right?

Click the box if you would like us to keep you in the loop as we work to resolve this issue.

Tell us where you found the issue and what you were trying to do.

My feedback is about: Analyze & Simulate

Additional Specificity

Copy+paste the hyperlink of the page on the Portal you were on. https://sparc.science/datasets/4?type=simulation

What action were you doing on the Portal? Selecting data for simulation modeling

Please specify if you selected "Other" in the previous question.

Any additional information to share?

KZzizzle commented 4 years ago

➤ DRC SIMCORE commented:

MBF SPARC the MIT license we use is more appropriate to software (in terms of copying, sharing, reusing) and we agreed with the NIH at the beginning of the contract that osparc would have the MIT license. It is also one of the most open licenses possible for software. Hence we asked code submitters to choose their license but encouraged the MIT one for the above reasons. This is not a bug and does not impede FAIR-ness

KZzizzle commented 4 years ago

➤ MBF SPARC commented:

DRC SIMCORE do we need to amend the dataset submission documentation to have a section on submitting OSPARC simulations with this license as an option? right now the documentation (https://sparc.science/help/7k8nEPuw3FjOq2HuS8OVsd) says only CC by 4.0 in the instructions. __

KZzizzle commented 4 years ago

➤ DRC SIMCORE commented:

MBF SPARC I think it's ok because simulations are not submitted through the blackfynn platform - for the moment PI's contact us individually. Soon we will have a form on osparc where they can submit their code and at that point we will write a new documentation page about how that should be used. One of the fields of the form will be the license type. You're just too fast for us 😉

KZzizzle commented 4 years ago

➤ MBF SPARC commented:

DRC SIMCORE alrighty! thanks for the clarification.