Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Thanks for telling us about database issues.
First, I hope you didn't download the complete SwissProt and TrEMBL databases
but only the proteins for the species you are working with? See
http://code.google.com/p/searchgui/wiki/DatabaseHelp#UniProt_Databases for how
to download the database for your species only.
Second, there is no need to download decoy sequences from UniProt as these can
be created using SearchGUI (http://searchgui.googlecode.com). Simply upload the
FASTA file in the Settings dialog and click the Decoy button. Reversed versions
of all the sequences will then be added. You can then use this database in your
SearchGUI or Mascot search.
I'm also not sure what the "Database Processing Tool" you refer to is. But
unless advanced database processing is required, using SearchGUI would be the
preferred option to make sure that the database is compatible with
PeptideShaker.
When using Mascot please remember to _not_ use the Mascot decoy option, as this
is adds random sequences and is not compatible with PeptideShaker. For more
details on using Mascot data in PeptideShaker, see
http://code.google.com/p/searchgui/wiki/DatabaseHelp#Mascot_Users. Note that
using SearchGUI (and thus OMSSA and X!Tandem) instead of Mascot makes it a lot
easier to get results that are compatible with PeptideShaker. And as using two
search engines almost always gives better results than just one, this is
normally the recommended approach.
As for the memory issues, could you check the file called 'startup.log' located
in the folder resources\conf. This file should show you the actual command line
executed and in it how much memory you gave it, e.g., -Xmx4000M for around 4
GB. If you have more than 2 GB available I would strongly recommend to increase
the value, as most modern proteomics datasets will benefit from this.
Let me know if you need more details.
Original comment by harald.b...@gmail.com
on 17 May 2013 at 2:55
(Issues assumed solved by the user.)
Original comment by harald.b...@gmail.com
on 9 Mar 2014 at 11:54
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
alessand...@tiscali.it
on 17 May 2013 at 2:28Attachments: