Closed FadiGEBRAYEL closed 3 weeks ago
Hi @FadiGEBRAYEL Thanks very much for your patience as I considered your question.
I note that you are using ROS1 Noetic.
I see a possivble cause of discrepancy between your real-world pointcloud and your Gazebo one. In your xacro, you have the scale set as '0.001'.
<mesh filename="file://$(find realsense2_description)/meshes/d405.stl" scale="0.001 0.001 0.001" />
However, the D405 model differs from most of the other RealSense 400 Series models in that its default depth scale is 0.01 because it is designed to specialize in close-range depth sensing.
Hi @FadiGEBRAYEL Do you require further assistance with this case, please? Thanks!
Case closed due to no further comments received.
Hello,
I am currently using the Intel RealSense D405 camera in a Gazebo simulation environment to replicate real-world scenarios. The purpose of my work is to scan a specific scene and emulate what a robot would see in real life using the camera in Gazebo. However, I am encountering significant inconsistencies between the point cloud data captured by the D405 camera in the simulation and the point cloud data captured in real life.
I am using the following xacro files for the camera setup:
_d405.gazebo.xacro
<?xml version="1.0"?>
_d405.urdf.xacro <?xml version="1.0"?>
test_d405_camera.urdf.xacro <?xml version="1.0"?>
Could you please provide guidance on how to better match the simulated point cloud data with the real-world data? Thank you for your assistance
ros version: noetic