Open mdeff opened 5 years ago
Hi @mdeff , thanks for getting in touch! We definitely appreciate your contributions to PyGSP
and this opportunity to chat about goals / direction.
graphtools
was quite simply born out of the realisation that multiple projects of ours were duplicating code in building graphs from data. In terms of the vision for graphtools
, you've more or less hit the nail on the head: our primary goal is building graphs from high-dimensional data, with a focus on computational biology. In its current form, graphtools
implements the alpha-decay kernel and landmark operator from PHATE, and the mutual nearest neighbors kernel from MELD.
There are definitely some shared goals here, and I think we can benefit from sharing some of the routines we implement for our graphs (e.g. BaseGraph.shortest_path
). However I'm not sure that the specific kernels we are building are necessarily widely-used enough in the GSP community to warrant including them in PyGSP
, at least for now.
Happy to hear your thoughts on this, as well as @dburkhardt and @stanleyjs.
Hi guys, I'm the maintainer of the PyGSP (which you obviously know about). I'm wondering: what is your vision for
graphtools
? How does it relate to thePyGSP
(e.g., different goals, additional features, etc.)? If there's enough common interest, we should maybe consider to join forces. :)Quickly going over the code and docs it seems that you are quite interested in building graphs from high-dimensional data, which is something we are pretty interested in as well (see e.g., epfl-lts2/pygsp#43).
No problem if you simply prefer to develop your own tools, I'm just being curious. Anyway, thanks for using our work, and for your contributions!