Closed tvami closed 1 month ago
I'll do the cleanup mentioned in https://github.com/LDMX-Software/ldmx-sw/pull/1285#discussion_r1569389393
and also compare how moving from old_ecal
to ecal
changes.
But generally, @tomeichlersmith do you agree that this PR adds something useful to ldmx-sw, or somehow since this branch was opened there are better ways to achieve the same thing?
Yea I think this is useful, I could definitely imagine someone wanting to generate a similar sample and this is the only way currently I know of to do that.
@tomeichlersmith I think you'll have to do the merge trunk
method again :/ following
git switch trunk
git pull
git switch -
git rebase trunk
resulted in a conflict
I am updating ldmx-sw, here are the details.
What are the issues that this addresses?
This work was done years ago at UCSB (by David Jiang). Given that we'd like to get rid of stale branches I rebased this and cleaned it a bit. I'm opening the PR more of a discussion if this is still useful.
As for testing I ran
Biasing/test/ecal_pn_nonfiducial.py
looks all good, and produces less events than the equivalentBiasing/test/ecal_pn.py
which makes me thing that all the events are non-fiducialCheck List
Related Sub-Module PRs
https://github.com/LDMX-Software/SimCore/pull/117