Closed podborski closed 12 months ago
That was something we left for future Dimitri and Deniz to handle. AFAIK, specification was either not correct or had missing information
ress
, encs
, rest
, and resu
were the problematic ones
Found this table in the 8th edition draft of ISOBMFF:
<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
Stream (Track) Type | Sample-Entry Code | SampleEntry Class |
---|---|---|
Video | resv | VisualSampleEntry |
Audio | resa | AudioSampleEntry or AudioSampleEntryV1 |
Metadata | resm | MetaDataSampleEntry |
Text | rest | SimpleTextSampleEntry |
Subtitle | resu | XMLSubtitleSampleEntry |
Systema | ress | |
Font | resf | FontSampleEntry |
Haptics | resp | HapticSampleEntry |
Volumetric visual | res3 | VolumetricVisualSampleEntry |
https://github.com/MPEGGroup/FileFormatConformance/blob/2aefa1e1a865bea24c235c7a265da61db68a5c00/data/standard_features/14496-12/boxes.json#L1134C24-L1134C24
@cconcolato do you know what this is? @DenizUgur not so sure where it came from, do you remember?