Closed reginafcompton closed 7 years ago
@shrayshray I just noticed that the concurrent meetings on June 22 include a committee and board meeting. I have the logic set-up to only handle cases, in which you have concurrent committee meetings. How do you want to handle a concurrent board and committee meeting? The same as above, or should we favor the board meeting?
Yes, the same.
—
Omar Camacho Metro Los Angeles Sr. Manager, Systems Projects, Research & Records Information Management
213.922.2335 metro.net | facebook.com/losangelesmetro | @metrolosangeles Metro provides excellence in service and support.
From: Regina Compton [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 5:03 PM To: datamade/la-metro-councilmatic la-metro-councilmatic@noreply.github.com Cc: Subscribed subscribed@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [datamade/la-metro-councilmatic] Home: Permanent solution for concurrent events (#162)
@shrayshrayhttps://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fshrayshray&data=01%7C01%7Ccamachoo%40metro.net%7C1ed1da34a0c94cf5bbbc08d4b51428c8%7Cab57129bdbfd4cacaa77fc74c40364af%7C0&sdata=DM46fazG2XqDcgud%2BEOin0DaOPQX5X7QaEHLiykXhYQ%3D&reserved=0 I just noticed that the concurrent meetings on June 22 include a committee and board meeting. I have the logic set-up to only handle cases, in which you have concurrent committee meetings. How do you want to handle a concurrent board and committee meeting? The same as above, or should we favor the board meeting?
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fdatamade%2Fla-metro-councilmatic%2Fissues%2F162%23issuecomment-309170057&data=01%7C01%7Ccamachoo%40metro.net%7C1ed1da34a0c94cf5bbbc08d4b51428c8%7Cab57129bdbfd4cacaa77fc74c40364af%7C0&sdata=d1%2F1VVGgwEVPDEomEegXM8BkIAXC%2Bs0IWrpPnW2dsSk%3D&reserved=0, or mute the threadhttps://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FAbb1-gYzeBQYh9j5IYcAaAqXCW1eLMHoks5sExeagaJpZM4NqyhJ&data=01%7C01%7Ccamachoo%40metro.net%7C1ed1da34a0c94cf5bbbc08d4b51428c8%7Cab57129bdbfd4cacaa77fc74c40364af%7C0&sdata=BCb2UQusp0jQkT9aCVG%2FUoil%2BCiNoHuf1huLGhGEqzM%3D&reserved=0.
Actually to be more specific. Show both meetings but make sure that the Regular Board Meeting is on top.
—
Omar Camacho Metro Los Angeles Sr. Manager, Systems Projects, Research & Records Information Management
213.922.2335 metro.net | facebook.com/losangelesmetro | @metrolosangeles Metro provides excellence in service and support.
From: Regina Compton [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 5:03 PM To: datamade/la-metro-councilmatic la-metro-councilmatic@noreply.github.com Cc: Subscribed subscribed@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [datamade/la-metro-councilmatic] Home: Permanent solution for concurrent events (#162)
@shrayshrayhttps://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fshrayshray&data=01%7C01%7Ccamachoo%40metro.net%7C1ed1da34a0c94cf5bbbc08d4b51428c8%7Cab57129bdbfd4cacaa77fc74c40364af%7C0&sdata=DM46fazG2XqDcgud%2BEOin0DaOPQX5X7QaEHLiykXhYQ%3D&reserved=0 I just noticed that the concurrent meetings on June 22 include a committee and board meeting. I have the logic set-up to only handle cases, in which you have concurrent committee meetings. How do you want to handle a concurrent board and committee meeting? The same as above, or should we favor the board meeting?
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fdatamade%2Fla-metro-councilmatic%2Fissues%2F162%23issuecomment-309170057&data=01%7C01%7Ccamachoo%40metro.net%7C1ed1da34a0c94cf5bbbc08d4b51428c8%7Cab57129bdbfd4cacaa77fc74c40364af%7C0&sdata=d1%2F1VVGgwEVPDEomEegXM8BkIAXC%2Bs0IWrpPnW2dsSk%3D&reserved=0, or mute the threadhttps://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FAbb1-gYzeBQYh9j5IYcAaAqXCW1eLMHoks5sExeagaJpZM4NqyhJ&data=01%7C01%7Ccamachoo%40metro.net%7C1ed1da34a0c94cf5bbbc08d4b51428c8%7Cab57129bdbfd4cacaa77fc74c40364af%7C0&sdata=BCb2UQusp0jQkT9aCVG%2FUoil%2BCiNoHuf1huLGhGEqzM%3D&reserved=0.
This will be the display on Thursday. @shrayshray does this look as expected?
@reginafcompton Looks great, thank you!!
We implemented a solution to handle three "simultaneously occurring" meetings, i.e., the same body of people meet in the same space, but for three distinct meetings that unfold one-after-the-other.
Related to #153
We need to find a more effective solution.
One option: Think about how to re-invent the event scraper, so that it runs every 2-3 minutes during these concurrent sessions; the scraping would determine the current meeting based on if the audio link is active.