The inbuilt reasoners, as far as I can tell, require you to pass the schema/ontologies of the data along with the data, when it does the inferencing
If I gave it myResource a mudbuildings:Stadium and included both mudbuildings and mud ontologies with the data, so it was able to reason (with the ontology data) that a Stadium is a mud:Locatable
But if I gave it data which was further down the tree, like myResource a something:Something, it will fail unless I override the code to pull that ontology as well
To make our ontologies properly extensible without needing to rewrite our views, I think we need to offer support to a custom Reasoner which will pull each ontology it comes across in the data. I haven't looked into what other Reasoners Jena supports though
The inbuilt reasoners, as far as I can tell, require you to pass the schema/ontologies of the data along with the data, when it does the inferencing
If I gave it
myResource a mudbuildings:Stadiumand included bothmudbuildingsandmudontologies with the data, so it was able to reason (with the ontology data) that a Stadium is amud:LocatableBut if I gave it data which was further down the tree, like
myResource a something:Something, it will fail unless I override the code to pull that ontology as wellTo make our ontologies properly extensible without needing to rewrite our views, I think we need to offer support to a custom Reasoner which will pull each ontology it comes across in the data. I haven't looked into what other Reasoners Jena supports though