Closed stephen-rowan closed 3 years ago
I'm waiting on input/feedback so I Can start minting tokens with Ancient Kraken. We need temporary names also for the tokens and decide how many holons we have/want to mint tokens for. So far I have: eGVNC / iGVNC eMRKT / iMRKT eNGRN / iNGRN ePRDT / iPRDT eMVP / iMVP
@tttroyyy @hududed
Hang on.... lots of unanswered questions here
From: DanM3rcurius @.> Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2021 5:30:44 PM To: NFT-DAO/Governance-HOLON @.> Cc: Subscribed @.***> Subject: Re: [NFT-DAO/Governance-HOLON] Triaging consensus levels (#37)
I'm waiting on input/feedback so I Can start minting tokens with Ancient Kraken. We need temporary names also for the tokens and decide how many holons we have/want to mint tokens for. So far I have: eGVNC / iGVNC eMRKT / iMRKT eNGRN / iNGRN ePRDT / iPRDT eMVP / iMVP
@tttroyyyhttps://github.com/tttroyyy @hududedhttps://github.com/hududed
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/NFT-DAO/Governance-HOLON/issues/37#issuecomment-817216253, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA6IVVULO6RW5C42NKPLQJDTIDNSJANCNFSM42TZ3KRA.
some comments, thoughts:
Do we have our own native token for auction / marketplace transactions or are we using ADA only? Are we entertaining ideas on liquidity pools? If yes, would it be NFTDAO-ADA, ND-ADA or N-ADA liquidity pools? Would be great to tie such tokens to these reputation/contribution tokens - though I suspect this is not feasible. As for token names, ones that include NFT-DAO would be ideal, but thats too long. What about: Governance - NeG/NiG Marketing - NeM/NiM Engineering - NeE/NiE Product - NeP/NiP
Hey Guys, sorry for the late reply. I've been off-line for most of the weekend. I'm drafting a response to this, which I will be able to tidy up tomorrow. There has been a lot of thought and consideration put into this flow-chart @DanM3rcurius and responses @hududed. As much as we have a goal to get minting quickly, there is also a lot of questions arising about 1) how the process of distributing our first token will map onto the current state of our community, 2) how our broader token distribution will be rolled out in the coming weeks/months and 3) the implications our immediate choices will have on the way the DAO functions in the near future. Far from a small task, but I feel excited that a resolution is nearing formation.
👋 @hududed thanks for the highly appreciated feedback 🙏
Here are my answers/thoughts:
Hey Guys, sorry for the late reply. I've been off-line for most of the weekend. I'm drafting a response to this, which I will be able to tidy up tomorrow. There has been a lot of thought and consideration put into this flow-chart @DanM3rcurius and responses @hududed. As much as we have a goal to get minting quickly, there is also a lot of questions arising about 1) how the process of distributing our first token will map onto the current state of our community, 2) how our broader token distribution will be rolled out in the coming weeks/months and 3) the implications our immediate choices will have on the way the DAO functions in the near future. Far from a small task, but I feel excited that a resolution is nearing formation.
great points @tttroyyy ! 1) We need to define who is in which holon in order to do a trial distribution. 2) we need to collaborate on the overall tokenomics, I’ll start with a token engineering canvas tomorrow. Didn’t have time last days as I was occupied with other projects. 3) the value of starting now with an experiment outweighs the risk of not having any community reputation or kudo system, as community is the one thing a DAO needs. The earlier we integrate and the more we value our steadily growing community, the more likely it is we will succeed as a true DAO.
T. Egan - NFT-DAO Tokenomics Matrix (13-4-21).pdf
Sorry for the open and close (my bad). Here is what I have been thinking about with the tokenomics model. This outlay doesn't generate tokens according to holon-types as you've been exploring @DanM3rcurius. For this pre-alpha mint, we probably wouldn't need to go into that depth I think, but we can explore the concept for up-coming phases of the token rollout. I'll forward this for @kopcho, Tyler and Michael to look at too.
Triaging consensus levels