Open FedorSteeman opened 4 months ago
@PipBrewer and @bhsi-snm to discuss the need for the "None" option.
Actually I probably need to chat to GBIF. There is a growing international need to fill in blank fields to meet MIDS standards amongst other things (to differentiate between data not captured and data not existing for example).
As per personal communication with @AstridBVW there is a problem with the option of "None" for typestatus once this arrives into Specify, because when it's exported to GBIF, GBIF raises a flag "Type status invalid". Ideally, the typestatus should be cleared when "None" is chosen.
This can probably be easily fixed either by:
Option 1 is probably preferred.
We should also clean up these invalid typestatuses in Specify.