Closed kyle-messier closed 11 months ago
@Spatiotemporal-Exposures-and-Toxicology The proportion of each NASS crop class by HUC-8, -10, and -12 is summarized as below: each red line represents the median proportion of a crop class across all HUC-8, -10, and -12 areas in HUC-2. As we are interested in the temporal trend of the proportions, I did not include legends in each plot (Also, I think that legends of 130 classes would not be effective for communication).
Lines are generally parallel with exceptions of the crossing of two crop types (e.g., HUC-2 "12" area) and the switch from one to another (e.g., HUC-2 "01" area). We can try backcasting the proportions with splines or ARIMA to fill in pre-2008 values.
@sigmafelix Thanks - this is very helpful. It looks like good evidence to marginalize away time. Would you agree?
@Spatiotemporal-Exposures-and-Toxicology Yes, the maximum change was around 0.2 (20 percent) in HUC-2 06 and 10 areas, which would not be a big issue as the change is monotonic. I will take averages for the NASS variables then join them into the covariate data frame.
We decided to take temporally marginal values. I reflected this on the covariate data, and will upload it after finishing to add the remaining covariates (TWI and agricultural pesticide usage).
Pre-2008 data take 62.3 percent of the AZO measurement data:
If we use crop data from available states for pre-2008 years, HUCs need to be strictly selected (i.e., completely within) to use the summaries. For other states, 2008 values can be filled.