Individual Videos

[NinjaBreadLord]

Name	Video Link
Everitt Cheng	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_zFjf_dWuw&ab_channel=ABowlOfRice
Kurtis Kwan	https://www.loom.com/share/be99f333943046e8af4e7ea4f7f6ed11 https://www.loom.com/share/28610b24a0054cc88b8988714f854178
Nathan Shih	https://www.loom.com/share/43534134fa384d4d9bf9bea446aaf9b8
Colin Howard	https://www.loom.com/share/c82fb383dbe442eba3ab9ea39c9d51c8
Jackson Golding	https://www.loom.com/share/7997eb944d4647868face5de22c15447

[NinjaBreadLord]

Kurtis Kwan - Your video is cut short at the 0:20 second mark, I can't see the rest. Nathan Shih - Collaboration explanation is good, maybe talk more on fixing errors but overall it is good, list/dictionary and Booleans good, demonstrates understanding really well. Colin Howard - Collaboration explanation good, talk more about the if statement and how it works, same with if statement in logic gates. Jackson Golding - On the collaboration section maybe talk more about fixing errors but overall it is good, maybe explain more on the Booleans/conditionals and binary understanding.

[KoolKidKai]

Nathan - (+) I like how organized and clear your scrum assignments are and how detailed your checklists are as well [1:00] (+) You have a clear explanation of your code and how it worked in our website [2:00] (+) Your video was well paced (-) You could've explained exactly which collegeboard chapters your assignments related to

Everitt - (+) scrum board is thoroughly explained [0:45] (+)ASCII code is neatly implemented and doesn't interfere with the main site [1:15] (+)Reaction test code is unique and an interesting idea [2:00] (-) the audio is very quiet

Kurtis - Video currently seems to be broken; won't play after 20 seconds, will regrade once fixed

Jackson - (+) Binary lab code seems organized and well made (+) Binary code explanation was very thorough (+) Conditionals code also is very nicely written (-) You could explain how the scrum board assists the team in collaboration more

[jacksongolding]

Everitt: You seem to have a good understanding of unicode as well as the start and stop function of the reaction test. You were also very detailed with your explanation of collaboration. I wish there was more on the reaction page so that I could see what the test looks like when it is completed.

Kurtis: Your video stops very early on and I can't see much of what you did.

Nathan: I like how in depth you went with the examples of collaboration. I also think you did a good job of explaining the dictionaries. I also liked the different effects that were put on the pictures. I think that your explanation could have been more structured because it seemed like you went into a slightly different topic without much of a transition.

Colin: You explained the collaboration aspect well and had several examples showing it. I liked the undressing the monkey feature you added. Your understanding of how to create the logic gates also seemed strong. I think that the logic gate page could be more pleasing to the eye as the green background is very overpowering and kind of takes away from what is actually going on.

[kkwan0]

Everitt: obligatory sound problem from rebecca. I like how you explained the scrumboard and the ASCII implementation. The Reaction test is a good idea once it is implemented Nathan: I like how you went in depth for collaboration, but it looks a little out of proportion, with almost half of the time being allotted to the collaboration bit. I also liked how you explained the different effects and how you applied it. Colin: I like how you explained each of your tasks, the only problem that I would have is that you could have explained the code more.