Closed TeckYewLow closed 1 year ago
Hi Teck,
Yes, IonQuant support fractionated LFQ-MBR. We also have a pre-released version supporting fractionated isotopic labelling quant (e.g., SILAC). Please contact yufe AT umich.edu if you want to have a try.
Best,
Fengchao
I already sent email to yufe AT umich.edu to get a trail copy for multi-fraction LFQ-MBR! Thanks!
Best regards,
Teck Yew
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 9:16 PM Fengchao @.***> wrote:
Hi Teck,
Yes, IonQuant support fractionated LFQ-MBR. We also have a pre-released version supporting fractionated isotopic labelling quant (e.g., SILAC). Please contact yufe AT umich.edu if you want to have a try.
Best,
Fengchao
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Nesvilab/IonQuant/issues/39#issuecomment-1482782328, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A6WRW7S6YGYXTVPOHNYPL73W5WNENANCNFSM6AAAAAAWGF6OEE . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
Pusat Perubatan UKM (PPUKM)
I don't think I received the email. Did you replace the AT
with @
?
Best,
Fengchao
Oh I see.
I did send to these addresses yesterday from my official email address: @.***
to: @. cc: Nesvilab/IonQuant @.>, Author @.***>
The message looked like this:
Dear Fengchao,
I would like to try fractionated LFQ-MBR. How can I implement it?
Best regards,
Teck
Best regards,
Teck Yew
On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 12:00 PM Fengchao @.***> wrote:
I don't think I received the email. Did you replace the AT with @?
Best,
Fengchao
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Nesvilab/IonQuant/issues/39#issuecomment-1483711614, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A6WRW7SMCTUP6M73PJ77MSTW5ZUXRANCNFSM6AAAAAAWGF6OEE . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
Pusat Perubatan UKM (PPUKM)
Hi @fcyu
If LFQ-MBR is used to analyzed label-free, multi-fraction LC-MS runs, how dos this algorithm work? Is MBR performed on Frac1 of Experiment1 to the corresponding Frac1 of Experiment2; and Frac2 of Experiment1 to the corresponding Frac2 of Experiment2 and so on? Or Is it performed on all loaded LC-MS runs regardless of fractions?
We have two parameters to control this: MBR min correlation
and MBR top runs
. IonQuant basically picks the "most similar" runs to transfer IDs. Details can be found from https://www.mcponline.org/article/S1535-9476(21)00050-5/fulltext
Best,
Fengchao
Thanks. I am new with MSFragger. I will read it up. By the way, I have send an email to request for version that enables multi-fraction LFQ-MBR but I have not received any reply yet.
Thank you very much!
I did not receive the email. Could you check if the email address is correct: yufe AT umich.edu
but replacing AT
with @
.
Best,
Fengchao
I have sent an email just now. I hope it won't be redirected to the spam folder.
Thank you so much!
Received your email and sent the link to download.
Best,
Fengchao
Thank you. I received 3 files. Philosopher 5.00; IonQuant 1.94; and Fragpipe 19.2. Inside the tools folder, I do not find MSFragger. Do I copy MSFragger 3.7 into the new tools folder? Also I loaded the new IonQuant 1.94 to the Fragpipe. I can't seem to find any button in the IonQuant tab to enable multi-frac LC-MS label-free quantification?
Best,
Teck
Do I copy MSFragger 3.7 into the new tools folder?
Yes, use your existing MSFragger.
I can't seem to find any button in the IonQuant tab to enable multi-frac LC-MS label-free quantification?
There is no additional button. It is supported under hood.
Best,
Fengchao
Thank you. So IonQuant can automatically identify the best fitting fraction (LC-MS run) within an Experiment to compare and correlate with other fitting fraction across different Experiments? I do not have to define any parameters? That is great!
You are welcome.
Hi,
I am new to Ion Quant. I plan to apply Ion Quant to perform LFQ-MBR on samples separated into multiple fractions. In the past, match-between runs only work for single LC-MS runs. Does Ion Quant support LC-MS runs from multiple fractions?
Thank you very much!
Best,
Teck