Closed cjhendrix closed 9 years ago
A couple of things here:
Let us know what you think.
I know that the attribute indicators which were left on CKAN when the wikipedia datasets were removed sometime before the launch. I believe this was because we use the attributes in the country centric reports. Will wait for @JavierTeran for decision on what to do with these on CKAN. The list of attribute indicators that I know to be on CKAN is as follows:
CG020 Formal Name CG030 Short Name CG070 Iso Country Alpha-3-Code CG080 Capital City CG100 Languages CG120 Currency Abbr CG140 Iso Currency Code CG150 Income Category CG290 Date Of Entry Into Un CG320 Country Code Iso Country Alpha-2-Code
We need to leave them on CPS for now as they are used in the reports. Creating a new attribute entity for them is low priority at the moment. I think anyone sophisticated enough to use our API won't be too flummoxed by seeing an indicator for country name, etc.
But I think we do need to delete the datasets on ckan, since they can't be graphed.
Sounds good. Thanks @cjhendrix. Should we go ahead and delete those from CKAN @takavarasha and @JavierTeran ?
Hi @cjhendrix @takavarasha @luiscape I totally agree. I just double checked and can't find them any more in the collections (xls, csv, readme). That was my only worry. We can delete the list as indicated above as soon as possible.
Deleted the list.
Please consider deleting any of the attribute indicators (currency code, short name, etc) since these do not meet our definition of an indicator (non numeric) and are therfore not graphable.
Tagging @JavierTeran