This repository uses the Apache License 2.0, but does not mention it in the README files. So this fact is only visible in pyproject.toml and indirectly because a LICENSE file exists.
The Python code uses frozendict and paramiko, two Python modules which use the LGPL. I think this is allowed (although some people disagree), but the LGPL requires at least a bit of documentation:
"Give prominent notice with each copy of the Combined Work that the Library is used in it and that the Library and its use are covered by this License."
Therefore I think that we should add a license statement to the documentation which not only mentions the Apache License explicitly, but also the two Python modules and their use of the LGPL.
This repository uses the Apache License 2.0, but does not mention it in the README files. So this fact is only visible in pyproject.toml and indirectly because a LICENSE file exists.
The Python code uses frozendict and paramiko, two Python modules which use the LGPL. I think this is allowed (although some people disagree), but the LGPL requires at least a bit of documentation:
"Give prominent notice with each copy of the Combined Work that the Library is used in it and that the Library and its use are covered by this License."
Therefore I think that we should add a license statement to the documentation which not only mentions the Apache License explicitly, but also the two Python modules and their use of the LGPL.