dacoinminster
commented
10 years ago Marv has a pull request in the works. I told him the TX51 crowdsale changes need to happen first though. I believe we have finalized everything that needs to be decided. The devs have walked through the spec with Marv and I, and they understand what is there, and know the coming changes too.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Ron Gross notifications@github.com wrote:
AKA the Metadex.
It has been in the spec in a while, and we are gearing up to implement it shortly. I'm opening this issue to track what is exactly needed for us to finalize the first version of the Metadex spec.
Related issues I'm aware of that need deciding as part of this are #44 https://github.com/mastercoin-MSC/spec/issues/44 #175 https://github.com/mastercoin-MSC/spec/issues/175. We can decide on a MVP version of the Metadex and add some of these later, but it's better to make a concious decision on what we want to include and what to postpone.
@dacoinminster https://github.com/dacoinminster, @marv-engine https://github.com/marv-engine - what else do we need in order to finalize the MVP of the Metadex spec?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/mastercoin-MSC/spec/issues/187.
marv-engine
AKA the Metadex.
It has been in the spec in a while, and we are gearing up to implement it shortly. I'm opening this issue to track what is exactly needed for us to finalize the first version of the Metadex spec.
Related issues I'm aware of that need deciding as part of this are #44 #175. We can decide on a MVP version of the Metadex and add some of these later, but it's better to make a concious decision on what we want to include and what to postpone.
@dacoinminster, @marv-engine - what else do we need in order to finalize the MVP of the Metadex spec?