OpenSourceMycetoma / Series-3-Phenothiazines

Project for the development of phenothiazine (and related tricyclic) anti-fungal drugs
0 stars 0 forks source link

Samples from NEU #6

Open MFernflower opened 1 year ago

MFernflower commented 1 year ago

I luckily came across a paper by the team at NEU about some tricyclic chlopromazine like compounds (based on carbazoles) that showed activity against Naegleria Folweri 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1149145

Since we as a team don't have the lab capacity to make novel phenothiazines at the moment this could be a good step forward!

MFernflower commented 1 year ago

Compounds 8d and 8c seems promising (potent against amoeba and very close to the chlorpromazine/tricyclic antidepressant/tricyclic antihistamine scaffold):

image

lferrins commented 1 year ago

Thanks @MFernflower, we are certainly happy to send compounds. I can prepare a list of available compounds and share with @mattodd to see what would be of interest to the project team.

MFernflower commented 1 year ago

My vote is for the carbazole series as published by Singh as they are very similar to chlorpromazine and other phenothiazines (that are known to have both anti-amoeba and anti-mold activity)

as for other compounds in your library I would reach out to @mattodd or @bebi78 once your list is finished!

@lferrins

bebi78 commented 1 year ago

@MFernflower @lferrins Compounds 8c and 8d might also be suitable for DMPK testing at Wellcome Centre in Dundee as part of the series 3 contingent since there are no other series 3 compounds selected/made.

MFernflower commented 1 year ago

@lferrins @loriferrins would it be possible to make a few novel phenothiazines at NEU? No other labs in the OSMYC group currently have time to do so and it would be a great step forward.

MFernflower commented 1 year ago

Some possible structures to make at NEU:

image N-ethyl-phenothiazine N-isoamyl-phenothiazine N-isohexyl-phenothiazine N-isovaleroyl-phenothiazine N-phenethyl-phenothiazine

lferrins commented 1 year ago

Some possible structures to make at NEU:

image N-ethyl-phenothiazine N-isoamyl-phenothiazine N-isohexyl-phenothiazine N-isovaleroyl-phenothiazine N-phenethyl-phenothiazine

@MFernflower we don't have chemistry actively ongoing for compounds like those shown here so we won't be able to contribute synthesis at this time. However, I will circle back with what materials we have available for testing in case there is interest there.

MFernflower commented 1 year ago

Thanks @MFernflower, we are certainly happy to send compounds. I can prepare a list of available compounds and share with @mattodd to see what would be of interest to the project team.

Any update on this? @OpenSourceMycetoma/corecontrib @lferrins

lferrins commented 1 year ago

@MFernflower I have sent the compound list to @mattodd and am awaiting a response. I don't have @bebi78 email address so couldn't include on the email.

lferrins commented 1 year ago

Attached is a list of all the analogs that we should have available in-house. I will preface this by saying that I have filtered out compounds that had no reported stock, or <5mg, but I have not eyeballed the vials, or run QC to confirm that they are still good. We would certainly do this if you want to test them. Please let me know and I can get folks working on it if you are interested. I am also happy to share the ADME and any potency data that we have on them.

Curaxin_Compound_List.csv

MFernflower commented 1 year ago

@lferrins My vote is for the highlighted compounds + NEU-0005879 and NEU-0007251 as they are pretty close to chlorpromazine:

image

Thoughts @OpenSourceMycetoma/corecontrib and @bebi78 ????

Maybe also NEU-0006058 and NEU-0007251 as well

MFernflower commented 1 year ago

@lferrins Was curious if any updates on this project

mattodd commented 1 year ago

Well @MFernflower of the compounds in the list from @lferrins I would suggest any compound that gave a decent selectivity. i.e. potency better than tox (so that we're not just testing compounds that are toxic). I've not correlated the available molecules in the spreadsheet with the molecules in the tables in the publication, to identify these compounds. Could you do that @MFernflower, and come up with a final list?

lferrins commented 1 year ago

@mattodd I like that approach. @MFernflower I can export a new spreadsheet and filter for compounds with available stock, and HepG2 data (I think we have this for most). I'll circle back later this week.

MFernflower commented 1 year ago

Maybe we could each (Me, @bebi78 and @mattodd pick out of a pair of compounds from Lori's library to then send to @wwjvdsande

My vote is for the two compounds in the Singh paper:

image

lferrins commented 1 year ago

A question, if the biological assay can handle it, why don't we just test as many as we can? How many can be run at once? Is the assay high throughput?

MFernflower commented 1 year ago

@lferrins you will need to talk with @wwjvdsande https://github.com/wwjvdsande about the amount of different compounds left over from the curaxin project - I am all for sending whatever you can get 10 mg of! .

wwjvdsande commented 1 year ago

@lferrins @mattodd @MFernflower I usually start with a rough screening at two concentrations in a 96 well plate. So if <80 compounds I can include them in one plate. The majority in the work is afterwards to determine the IC50 and MIC50 and the larvae. We could test all of them of course, but in case they are all potent we can only select a few for the in vivo experiments next year.

lferrins commented 1 year ago

@wwjvdsande the number that we have available is <80 so I can work with my team to track down what we have available and get them sent to you. I will reach out to you via email to work out the logistics of that. Completely understood regarding in vivo experiments also.

MFernflower commented 1 year ago

44 compounds are in the list that I was given - likely gonna be less because NEU might not have stock of all of the list compounds - 5 to 10 mg of each I assume yes? @lferrins @OpenSourceMycetoma/corecontrib

wwjvdsande commented 1 year ago

@MFernflower @lferrins 5-10 mg stock is more than enough. The in vitro screenings will be for this winter.

MFernflower commented 1 year ago

@lferrins have compounds been shipped?

lferrins commented 1 year ago

@lferrins have compounds been shipped?

Yes, they have been shipped, and I believe they have been received also.

MFernflower commented 1 year ago

Somebody will need to merge this CSV with the master list when they have time as I do not know how to do this

https://github.com/OpenSourceMycetoma/Series-3-Phenothiazines/files/12478155/Curaxin_Compound_List.csv

@OpenSourceMycetoma/corecontrib

wwjvdsande commented 1 year ago

@MFernflower @OpenSourceMycetoma/corecontrib we are currently testing these and the first preliminary results look promising. Noted that they are not uploaded in the masterlist yet. Can somebody do that so that we can add the activity after we have repeated the experiment?

MFernflower commented 1 year ago

@wwjvdsande I did upload them to a different sheet on the masterlist called "CURAXIN" - I dont know how to make new MYOS codes or how to merge the two sheets into one however

mattodd commented 1 year ago

OK @MFernflower done. Can you please check that they are all in there, and then delete your Curaxin sheet? Note that I have assigned codes based on there being no salts in this set. If there are (@lferrins), then I'll need to alter the codes. While doing this I noticed a bunch of USyd compounds awaiting codes and which (because of a spreadsheet SNAFU) had wrong "series" values, which I've highlighted in red. Could someone please take a look @KlementineJBS @fantasy121

@wwjvdsande the NEU codes can now be matched with MycetOS codes.

lferrins commented 1 year ago

@mattodd the batch number is designated by the "AA-00X" part of the molecule name and indicates that they are all the free base. Thanks for taking care of this!

mattodd commented 1 year ago

@lferrins yes, but I've assigned the MyOS codes on the assumption they are free bases. The NEU codes don't have that designation, so I just wanted to be sure my assumption was correct.

lferrins commented 1 year ago

@mattodd yeah, the original email that I sent had them. I think they might have dropped off at some point. Ok if I go and update them? It will be handy for us to associate the data in our database to the right batch

MFernflower commented 1 year ago

Thank you everyone!

@mattodd @wwjvdsande @lferrins

I deleted the extra sheet and put in the notes section that the compounds were shipped as freebase

MFernflower commented 1 year ago

@mattodd yeah, the original email that I sent had them. I think they might have dropped off at some point. Ok if I go and update them? It will be handy for us to associate the data in our database to the right batch

I think I ended up not importing them when I uploaded the csv to the google sheet - totally fine if you want to restore them

@lferrins

lferrins commented 1 year ago

@mattodd I went through and added the batch information for the compounds that were actually shipped. Unfortunately, not all of the compounds in the spreadsheet were found/passed QC so there are more present then we actually shipped. I am not sure if you want to go through and delete the compounds that were not tested/shipped? Sorry!

MFernflower commented 1 year ago

Not all 44 entries in the CSV were actual real things shipped? @lferrins

On Fri, Nov 10, 2023, 12:56 PM Lori Ferrins @.***> wrote:

@mattodd https://github.com/mattodd I went through and added the batch information for the compounds that were actually shipped. Unfortunately, not all of the compounds in the spreadsheet were found/passed QC so there are more present then we actually shipped. I am not sure if you want to go through and delete the compounds that were not tested/shipped? Sorry!

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/OpenSourceMycetoma/Series-3-Phenothiazines/issues/6#issuecomment-1806175011, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAYEWDVGHLU2IRFIINUVN5TYDZTFTAVCNFSM6AAAAAA2WJOYROVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQMBWGE3TKMBRGE . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.*** com>

lferrins commented 1 year ago

@MFernflower correct - the original spreadsheet had the list of compounds that we thought we had available. We had either exhausted the stocks, or they did not pass QC to be sent out. We shipped 15 compounds to Wendy in the end.

MFernflower commented 1 year ago

@lferrins @mattodd if you can delete the ones not sent from the master list that would be good

I think the myos will need to be renumbered but I think I should be able to do it

On Fri, Nov 10, 2023, 3:49 PM Lori Ferrins @.***> wrote:

@MFernflower https://github.com/MFernflower correct - the original spreadsheet had the list of compounds that we thought we had available. We had either exhausted the stocks, or they did not pass QC to be sent out. We shipped 15 compounds to Wendy in the end.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/OpenSourceMycetoma/Series-3-Phenothiazines/issues/6#issuecomment-1806412423, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAYEWDVDDNAK7LPAKHEPVDLYD2HORAVCNFSM6AAAAAA2WJOYROVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQMBWGQYTENBSGM . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.*** com>

mattodd commented 1 year ago

So to recap someone needs to delete the added compounds with the shorter codes and keep the ones with the longer codes and then redo the MyOS codes? There should be a total of 15. When that's done someone needs to alert Wendy and Ma so that they can correlate the NEU codes with the MyOS codes and report the latter. Is that it?

lferrins commented 1 year ago

@mattodd yes, that is right. Sorry for the extra work.

MFernflower commented 1 year ago

I should be able to do that sometime today

On Mon, Nov 13, 2023, 5:55 PM Mat Todd @.***> wrote:

So to recap someone needs to delete the added compounds with the shorter codes and keep the ones with the longer codes and then redo the MyOS codes? There should be a total of 15. When that's done someone needs to alert Wendy and Ma so that they can correlate the NEU codes with the MyOS codes and report the latter. Is that it?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/OpenSourceMycetoma/Series-3-Phenothiazines/issues/6#issuecomment-1809264347, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAYEWDXWUFNMPJJ4IPRYIZ3YEKQM7AVCNFSM6AAAAAA2WJOYROVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQMBZGI3DIMZUG4 . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.*** com>

MFernflower commented 1 year ago

I just did the job but only ended up with 14 entries @lferrins

bebi78 commented 11 months ago

@MFernflower I noticed that curaxin CBL0137 was invented at Cleveland Clinic (I work together with some scientists there) as p53 activator and histone-chaperone inhibitor (FACT complex inhibitor). The compound already underwent phase 1 trial as anticancer drug (given intravenously) and was well tolerated by cancer patients (see link). So the NEU compounds are very promising drug candidates. https://ascopubs.org/doi/abs/10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.3583

MFernflower commented 11 months ago

@bebi78 I assume no data in yet for these molecules?

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023, 10:50 AM bebi78 @.***> wrote:

@MFernflower https://github.com/MFernflower I noticed that curaxin CBL0137 was invented at Cleveland Clinic (I work together with some scientists there) as p53 activator and histone-chaperone inhibitor (FACT complex inhibitor). The compound already underwent phase 1 trial as anticancer drug (given intravenously) and was well tolerated by cancer patients (see link). So the NEU compounds are very promising drug candidates. https://ascopubs.org/doi/abs/10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.3583

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/OpenSourceMycetoma/Series-3-Phenothiazines/issues/6#issuecomment-1836341119, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAYEWDV7D5XAY4QU553I7ILYHH4FHAVCNFSM6AAAAAA2WJOYROVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQMZWGM2DCMJRHE . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.*** com>

MFernflower commented 11 months ago

Interesting that pubchem has an entry for an analoge of curaxin 137 with the diacetylcarbazole head replaced with phenothiazine CID 61387607

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023, 3:38 PM MFernflower @.***> wrote:

@bebi78 I assume no data in yet for these molecules?

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023, 10:50 AM bebi78 @.***> wrote:

@MFernflower https://github.com/MFernflower I noticed that curaxin CBL0137 was invented at Cleveland Clinic (I work together with some scientists there) as p53 activator and histone-chaperone inhibitor (FACT complex inhibitor). The compound already underwent phase 1 trial as anticancer drug (given intravenously) and was well tolerated by cancer patients (see link). So the NEU compounds are very promising drug candidates. https://ascopubs.org/doi/abs/10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.3583

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/OpenSourceMycetoma/Series-3-Phenothiazines/issues/6#issuecomment-1836341119, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAYEWDV7D5XAY4QU553I7ILYHH4FHAVCNFSM6AAAAAA2WJOYROVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQMZWGM2DCMJRHE . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.*** com>

lferrins commented 11 months ago

@MFernflower CID 61387607 is an analog of promethazine (des-methyl) and I recall that your original request for analogs featured the phenothiazine. Our focus has been on removing/modifying the acetyl groups on the CBL compounds as these could be problematic for a drug.

MFernflower commented 11 months ago

@lferrins there are other possible tricyclic cores to consider curaxin_ideas

MFernflower commented 11 months ago

@MFernflower CID 61387607 is an analog of promethazine (des-methyl) and I recall that your original request for analogs featured the phenothiazine. Our focus has been on removing/modifying the acetyl groups on the CBL compounds as these could be problematic for a drug.

Promethazine has a different amine pattern (tertiary amine) than curaxin 137 (secondary amine) @lferrins

It is quite interesting how similar they are however

MFernflower commented 10 months ago

@OpenSourceMycetoma/corecontrib I was just wondering about the status of in-vitro testing of the compounds sent from NEU

wwjvdsande commented 10 months ago

@MFernflower they where tested at 100 and 25 uM but need one more repetition than we will upload the data on the sheet too.

wwjvdsande commented 9 months ago

@MFernflower we uploaded both the high/low screening data as well as the IC50 and IC90. Apparantly there were 5 interesting compounds between them

MFernflower commented 9 months ago

@P-Rayner one of the NEU tricyclics came back with a good IC90

ketcher

Perhaps this compound could be worth making as a follow up: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/61387607