Remove My Code; Will Handle 1.17 and 1.18 tomorrow morning.

[FrankTCA]

Also would like to mention:

1) I never claimed I was the most active developer "during my time". What I claimed was "during the last few months" I was the only person active except for a few commits I forced out of Authvin, starting "December 15th". 2) Everything I said in that article is true to the best of my knowledge, and I don't take it back. Wahrheit does "lie for a living". That's what lawyers do.

If you want to do any further saving face, I expect that you don't lock the issue like you did last time to prevent me from telling the truth to the community.

[CLAassistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[FrankTCA]

I'm not signing the CLA.

Merge in the commits.

[SXRWahrheit]

This pull request requests the reversion of contributions that are not yours or cannot reasonably be construed as copyrightable; as a reminder, while you have no rights to revoke code contributions submitted to a project that has always been published under an MIT license (and which was licensed as such for the duration of your contributions), we will consider accepting a pull request that does not maliciously vandalize the project by reverting code changes you did not author.

[SXRWahrheit]

Also, you will be required to sign the CLA if you wish to make a contribution, even if it is a contribution to remove your authorship.

Even if you do not submit a non-malicious pull request, we plan to eliminate any git blame reference to you with additional contributions and rewrites of your code for performance and style reasons.